The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition
Abstract
Ideas competitions appear to be a promising tool for crowdsourcing and open innovation processes, especially for business-to-business software companies. Active participation of potential lead users is the key to success. Yet a look at existing ideas competitions in the software field leads to the conclusion that many information technology (IT)-based ideas competitions fail to meet requirements upon which active participation is established. The paper describes how activation-enabling functionalities can be systematically designed and implemented in an IT-based ideas competition for enterprise resource planning software. We proceeded to evaluate the outcomes of these design measures and found that participation can be supported using a two-step model. The components of the model support incentives and motives of users. Incentives and motives of the users then support the process of activation and consequently participation throughout the ideas competition. This contributes to the successful implementation and maintenance of the ideas competition, thereby providing support for the development of promising innovative ideas. The paper concludes with a discussion of further activation-supporting components yet to be implemented and points to rich possibilities for future research in these areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2003) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.443040 · Cited by 1,531
Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation
Shneiderman, B. (2000) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/344949.345077 · Cited by 432 · cited 1×
“supporting creativity is the “Genex framework” for developing user interfaces for supporting creativity [32, 33, 34].”
BackgroundShneiderman, B. (2002) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/570907.570945 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Community‐Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation
Bullinger, A. C., Neyer, A., Rass, M., & Moeslein, K. M. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00565.x · Cited by 336
Copy, transform, combine: Exploring the remix as a form of innovation
Flath, C. M., Friesike, S., Wirth, M., & Thiesse, F. (2017) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/s41265-017-0043-9 · Cited by 96
How to Solve Problems with Crowds: A Computer‐Based Simulation Model
Vuculescu, O., & Bergenholtz, C. (2014) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12059 · Cited by 22
Collaboration among Crowdsourcees: Towards a Design Theory for Collaboration Process Design
Tavanapour, N., & Bittner, E. A. C. (2017) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.040 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Leimeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-224
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W1966119171
- Cited by
- 745
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 88.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2753/mis0742-1222260108
- The paper
- Leimeister, J. M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., & Krcmar, H. (2009). Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition. Journal of Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.2753/mis0742-1222260108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.