Cited by 576Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making a Life Worth Living: Neural Correlates of Well-Being

Abstract

Despite the vast literature that has implicated asymmetric activation of the prefrontal cortex in approach-withdrawal motivation and emotion, no published reports have directly explored the neural correlates of well-being. Eighty-four right-handed adults (ages 57–60) completed self-report measures of eudaimonic well-being, hedonic well-being, and positive affect prior to resting electroencephalography. As hypothesized, greater left than right superior frontal activation was associated with higher levels of both forms of well-being. Hemisphere-specific analyses documented the importance of goal-directed approach tendencies beyond those captured by approach-related positive affect for eudaimonic but not for hedonic well-being. Appropriately engaging sources of appetitive motivation, characteristic of higher left than right baseline levels of prefrontal activation, may encourage the experience of well-being.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00686.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Electroencephalographic Society, 1991, Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 8, 200
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 575

Metadata

Authors
Urry, H. L., Nitschke, J. B., Dolski, I., Jackson, D. C., Dalton, K. M., Mueller, C. J., Rosenkranz, M. A., Ryff, C. D., Singer, B. H., & Davidson, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2004-06
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
367-372
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2155706205
Cited by
576
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 39
FWCI
20.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH61083, P50MH061083, T32MH18931, P50-MH 52354, P50MH052354, MH 43454, K08MH063984, K08-MH63984, T32MH018931)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR003186, M01 RR-03186)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
eudaimonic well-being, hedonic well-being, positive affect, prefrontal cortex, superior frontal cortex, hemispheric lateralization, approach motivation, appetitive motivation, goal-directed behavior, older adults
MeSH terms
Attitude, Brain, Electrocardiography, Emotions, Humans, Life Change Events, Middle Aged, Motivation, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review