Cited by 55Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Attachment and well-being: Mediatory roles of mindfulness, psychological inflexibility, and resilience

Calvo, Vincenzo, D’Aquila, Claudia, Rocco, Diego, Carraro, Elena·2022·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-020-00820-2

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calvo, V., D’Aquila, C., Rocco, D., & Carraro, E.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Calvo, Vincenzo
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2020-05-30
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
2966-2979
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W3031830956
Cited by
55
References
119
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
adult attachment, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, psychological well-being, trait mindfulness, psychological inflexibility, resilience, insecure attachment, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review