The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Alternative to Null-Hypothesis Significance Tests
Open accessAbstract
The statistic P rep estimates the probability of replicating an effect. It captures traditional publication criteria for signal-to-noise ratio, while avoiding parametric inference and the resulting Bayesian dilemma. In concert with effect size and replication intervals, P rep provides all of the information now used in evaluating research, while avoiding many of the pitfalls of traditional statistical inference.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators
Hedges, L. V. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164588 · Cited by 5,695
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331 · Cited by 1,558
Psychophysiology of aggression, psychopathy, and conduct problems: A meta-analysis
Lorber, M. F. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.531 · Cited by 648
Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289131 · Cited by 548
Estimation in Parallel Randomized Experiments
Rubin, D. B. (1981) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.3102/10769986006004377 · Cited by 269
Understanding research synthesis (meta-analysis).
Mosteller, F., & Colditz, G. A. (1996) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.000245 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis
Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.2.225 · Cited by 3,688
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490
Signaling Threat: How Situational Cues Affect Women in Math, Science, and Engineering Settings
Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x · Cited by 1,048
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests
Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406923 · Cited by 945
Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers.
Casasanto, D. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0015854 · Cited by 871
Metadata
- Authors
- Killeen, P. R.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 345-353
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2144712959
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 51.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
