Cited by 482Phonetics and Phonology ResearchSpeech and Audio ProcessingMultisensory perception and integration

Visual Prosody and Speech Intelligibility: Head Movement Improves Auditory Speech Perception

Munhall, K.G., Jones, Jeffery A., Callan, Daniel E., Kuratate, Takaaki, Vatikiotis-Bateson, Eric·2004·Psychological Science

Abstract

People naturally move their heads when they speak, and our study shows that this rhythmic head motion conveys linguistic information. Three-dimensional head and face motion and the acoustics of a talker producing Japanese sentences were recorded and analyzed. The head movement correlated strongly with the pitch (fundamental frequency) and amplitude of the talker's voice. In a perception study, Japanese subjects viewed realistic talking-head animations based on these movement recordings in a speech-in-noise task. The animations allowed the head motion to be manipulated without changing other characteristics of the visual or acoustic speech. Subjects correctly identified more syllables when natural head motion was present in the animation than when it was eliminated or distorted. These results suggest that nonverbal gestures such as head movements play a more direct role in the perception of speech than previously known.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502010.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munhall, K. G., Jones, J. A., Callan, D. E., Kuratate, T., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP)
  • ATR-International Human Information Science Laboratories, Kyoto, Japan
Corresponding author
Munhall, K.G.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2004-02
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
133-137
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2118004237
Cited by
482
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 27
FWCI
20.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC 05774, R01DC005774)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
visual prosody, head movement, speech intelligibility, speech perception, nonverbal gestures, fundamental frequency, pitch, talking head animation, speech perception in noise, Japanese speech
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Facial Expression, Female, Gestures, Humans, Male, Perceptual Distortion, Phonetics, Semantics, Sound Localization, Sound Spectrography, Speech Acoustics, Speech Intelligibility, Speech Perception, User-Computer Interface, Head Movements, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review