Cited by 108Phonetics and Phonology ResearchMultisensory perception and integrationSpeech and Audio Processing

Bimodal speech perception: an examination across languages

Open access
Massaro, Dominic W., Cohen, Michael M., Gesi, Antoinette, Heredia, Roberto, Tsuzaki, Minoru·1993·Journal of Phonetics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30230-x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Native language experience bears on the response inventories that subjects use in McGurk-type experiments.

    “At the very least, native language experience bears on the response inventories that subjects use in McGurk-type experiments (Massaro et aI., 1993).”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Massaro et al., 1993

  • Although the infant results on their own do not provide unequivocal support for an extraexperiential basis, they add to the evidence for linguistic universality, haptic influences, and early sensitivity to audiovisual speech correspondence.

    “To summarize, although our infant results on their own do not provide unequivocal support for an extraexperiential basis, they do add to the evidence for linguistic universality (Massaro et al., 1993), haptic influences (Fowler & Dekle, 1991), and early sensitivity to audiovisual speech correspondence (see, e.g., Walton & Bower, 1993) toward these ends.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Massaro et al., 1993

  • There is support that the general strategies underlying the McGurk effect are independent of specific language experience, which could implicate a non experiential basis.

    “Thus, there is support that the general strategies underlying the McGurk effect are independent of specific language experience, which could implicate a non experiential basis.”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Massaro et al. (1993)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Massaro, D. W., Cohen, M. M., Gesi, A., Heredia, R., & Tsuzaki, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP)
Venue
Journal of Phonetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-10
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
445-478
ISSN
0095-4470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1744636890
Cited by
108
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Phonetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
speech perception, audiovisual integration, Spanish language, English language, cross-linguistic comparison, categorical perception, fuzzy modeling, speech synthesis, face-to-face communication, language and culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review