The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions
Abstract
This paper explores social support and community development among members of a computer-supported distance learning program. The research focuses on what characterizes this community, and how students define and maintain community while largely restricted to communication through media that have been viewed as unsuitable for the maintenance of close social bonds. Interviews conducted over a year with 17 students reveal the importance of community and its role in supporting them in their “different kind of world” and important temporal and technological dimensions associated with community development. Each cohort begins in physical proximity with an intensive, on-campus “boot camp” that acts as a lasting bonding experience. When students return home, they reinvent this physical proximity as virtual proximity, appropriating technology and the opportunities afforded them by class and program structures to socialize and work with people they met on-campus. They enjoy the temporal proximity of “live” lectures and appropriate Internet Relay Chat's “whispering” facility to socialize; they make near-synchronous use of email, and use the timing of assignment submission to initiate email exchanges. Those who fail to make such connections feel isolated and more stressed than those who are more active in the community. Recommendations include promoting initial bonding, monitoring and supporting continued interaction and participation, and providing multiple means of communication to support the need to engage in work and social interaction, both publicly and privately. Overall, our interviews show that belonging to a community brings benefits to the individuals and to the program, and supports efforts by educators who strive to provide such a community for their distance learners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists
Strauss, A. L. (1987) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557842 · Cited by 12,277
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868
Cited by
Social networks and Internet connectivity effects
Haythornthwaite, C. (2005) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/13691180500146185 · Cited by 1,315
Self-citationStrong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media
Haythornthwaite, C. (2002) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972240290108195 · Cited by 747
Self-citationWALLACE, R. M. (2003) · Education, Communication & Information · doi:10.1080/14636310303143 · Cited by 405
Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (2006) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v7i3.325 · Cited by 314
(2007) · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robins, J., & Shoemaker, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-06-23
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 0-0
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978713529
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 164.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00114.x
- The paper
- Haythornthwaite, C., Kazmer, M. M., Robins, J., & Shoemaker, S. (2006). Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00114.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.