Cited by 114Team Dynamics and PerformanceInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationKnowledge Management and Sharing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams

Open access
Walsh, John P., Maloney, Nancy G.·2007·Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Abstract

This article reviews the structural characteristics of work organizations that are likely to increase collaboration problems and tests the relationships between collaboration structure and problems using data from a survey of scientists in four fields (experimental biology, mathematics, physics, and sociology). Two groups of problems are identified: problems of coordination and misunderstandings and problems of cultural differences and information security. Greater coordination problems are associated with size, distance, interdependence, and scientific competition. Problems of culture and security are associated with size, distance, scientific competition, and commercialization. Email use is associated with reporting fewer coordination problems, but not fewer problems of culture and security, while neither phone use nor face-to-face meetings significantly reduces problems. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for designers of collaboration technologies and researchers involved in scientific collaborations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00346.x

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Ancona, 1990, Information technology and work groups, 173
  2. Blau, 1955, Dynamics of Bureaucracy
  3. Blau, 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity
  4. Burns, 1961, Mechanistic and organic systems of management
  5. Cohen, 1994, University-industry research centers in the United States
  6. Ibarra, 1998, Network assessment exercise: MBA version
  7. Kraut, 1990, Communication in scientific research, 149
  8. March, 1958, Organizations
  9. National Science Board [NSB], 2000, Science and engineering indicators, 2000
  10. National Science Board [NSB], 2006, Science and engineering indicators, 2006
  11. Olson, 2003,, Collaboratory life
  12. Owen-Smith, 2000, Public Science, Private Science
  13. Setlock, 2005, Managing work trajectories in collaborative writing
  14. Sirianni, 1993, Learning pluralism, 555
  15. Smith, 1976, The Wealth of Nations
  16. Sproull, 1991, Connections
  17. Thompson, 1967, Organizations in Action

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 114

Metadata

Authors
Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
712-732
ISSN
1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032906242
Cited by
114
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
research collaboration, coordination problems, cultural differences, information security, team size, geographic distance, interdependence, scientific competition, commercialization, email use, telephone use, face-to-face meetings, communication media, collaboration technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review