The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaboration Structure, Communication Media, and Problems in Scientific Work Teams
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews the structural characteristics of work organizations that are likely to increase collaboration problems and tests the relationships between collaboration structure and problems using data from a survey of scientists in four fields (experimental biology, mathematics, physics, and sociology). Two groups of problems are identified: problems of coordination and misunderstandings and problems of cultural differences and information security. Greater coordination problems are associated with size, distance, interdependence, and scientific competition. Problems of culture and security are associated with size, distance, scientific competition, and commercialization. Email use is associated with reporting fewer coordination problems, but not fewer problems of culture and security, while neither phone use nor face-to-face meetings significantly reduces problems. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings for designers of collaboration technologies and researchers involved in scientific collaborations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, asynchronous technology (e.g., text-based tools) provide provide the ability to take one's time when asking a question or crafting a response [144,261], which leads to efficient, focused conversations [77,144] that can be quicker than other forms of communication.”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [261]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Several researchers have concluded that geographically distributed teams experience higher levels of conflict [8,46,103,108,188,261].”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [261]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Other studies showed that virtual teams face challenges that could be mitigated with explicit management [83,188,243,261].”
From Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020) · cites this paper as [261]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w7552 · Cited by 2,987
Self-citationExploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM DEMOGRAPHY AND CORPORATE STRATEGIC CHANGE.
Wiersema, M. F., & BANTEL, K. A. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256474 · Cited by 2,929
Organizations and Environments
Hougland, J. G., Shepard, J. M., & Aldrich, H. E. (1980) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257814 · Cited by 2,896
Science and Engineering Indicators
Washington, E., & Warren, M. E. (2004) · Cited by 2,822
Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace
Podolny, J. M., & Baron, J. N. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657354 · Cited by 2,043
Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations
Ven, A. H. V. D., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2094477 · Cited by 1,979
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Ancona, 1990, Information technology and work groups, 173
- Blau, 1955, Dynamics of Bureaucracy
- Blau, 1977, Inequality and Heterogeneity
- Burns, 1961, Mechanistic and organic systems of management
- Cohen, 1994, University-industry research centers in the United States
- Ibarra, 1998, Network assessment exercise: MBA version
- Kraut, 1990, Communication in scientific research, 149
- March, 1958, Organizations
- National Science Board [NSB], 2000, Science and engineering indicators, 2000
- National Science Board [NSB], 2006, Science and engineering indicators, 2006
- Olson, 2003,, Collaboratory life
- Owen-Smith, 2000, Public Science, Private Science
- Setlock, 2005, Managing work trajectories in collaborative writing
- Sirianni, 1993, Learning pluralism, 555
- Smith, 1976, The Wealth of Nations
- Sproull, 1991, Connections
- Thompson, 1967, Organizations in Action
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5 · Cited by 633
Factors of collaborative working: A framework for a collaboration model
Patel, H., Pettitt, M., & Wilson, J. R. (2011) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.04.009 · Cited by 384
Harley, D., Acord, S. K., Earl‐Novell, S., Lawrence, S., & King, C. J. (2010) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 213
Openness and innovation in the US: Collaboration form, idea generation and implementation
Walsh, J. P., Lee, Y.-N., & Nagaoka, S. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.013 · Cited by 197
Self-citationThe bureaucratization of science
Walsh, J. P., & Lee, Y.-N. (2015) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.010 · Cited by 119
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Walsh, John P.
- Venue
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 712-732
- ISSN
- 1083-6101 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032906242
- Semantic Scholar
- 839b6935720dc9a386d975e45331804f96a1cb77
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- research collaboration, coordination problems, cultural differences, information security, team size, geographic distance, interdependence, scientific competition, commercialization, email use, telephone use, face-to-face meetings, communication media, collaboration technologies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
