Cited by 44Human-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Evidence suggesting preadaptation to domestication throughout the small Felidae

CAMERON-BEAUMONT, CHARLOTTE, LOWE, SARAH E., BRADSHAW, JOHN W. S.·2002·Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Abstract

One obstacle in the development of a coherent theoretical framework for the process of animal domestication is the rarity of domestication events in human history. It is unclear whether: (1) many species are suitable for domestication, the limiting factor being the requirement of people for new domestic animals; or (2) very few species are preadapted for domestication. Comparisons between 16 species and subspecies of small cats (Felidae) kept in zoos indicated that affiliative behaviour towards people, an important preadaptation to domestication, is widely, if patchily, distributed throughout this taxon, and is not concentrated in species closely related to the domestic cat, Felis silvestris catus. The highest proportion of individuals showing affiliative behaviour was found in the ocelot lineage, which is estimated to have diverged from the rest of the Felidae between 5 and 13 Mya. The domestication of F. silvestris alone among felids is therefore likely to have been the result of a specific set of human cultural events and requirements in the Egyptian New Kingdom, rather than the consequence of a unique tendency to tame-ness in this subspecies.© 2002 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 75, 2002, 361–366.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02077.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CAMERON-BEAUMONT, C., LOWE, S. E., & BRADSHAW, J. W. S.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
BRADSHAW, JOHN W. S.
Venue
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2002-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
361-366
ISSN
  • 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8312
OpenAlex
W2103692853
Cited by
44
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Panthera
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
animal domestication, preadaptation, small cats, affiliative behavior, human-animal interaction, Leopardus pardalis, cats, zoo animals, New Kingdom Egypt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review