Cited by 151Animal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Social bonds in birds are associated with brain size and contingent on the correlated evolution of life-history and increased parental investment: AVIAN BRAIN EVOLUTION

Open access
SHULTZ, SUSANNE, DUNBAR, ROBIN I. M.·2010·Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Abstract

In birds, large brains are associated with a series of population-level phenomena, including invasion success, species richness, and resilience to population decline. Thus, they appear to open up adaptive opportunities through flexibility in foraging and anti-predator behaviour. The evolutionary pathway leading to large brain size has received less attention than behavioural and ecological correlates. Using a comparative approach, we show that, independent of previously recognized associations with developmental constraints, relative brain size in birds is strongly related to biparental care, pair-bonding, and stable social relationships. We also demonstrate correlated evolution between large relative brain size and altricial development, and that the evolution of both traits is contingent on biparental care. Thus, biparental care facilitates altricial development, which permits the evolution of large relative brain size. Finally, we show that large relative brain size is associated with pair-bond strength, itself a likely consequence of cooperation and negotiation between partners under high levels of parental investment. These analyses provide an evolutionary model for the evolution of and prevalence of biparental care, altricial development, and pair-bonding in birds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01427.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SHULTZ, S., & DUNBAR, R. I. M.
Affiliations
British Academy (GB)
Venue
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2010-04-20
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
111-123
ISSN
  • 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8312
OpenAlex
W1898587620
Cited by
151
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • British Academy
  • Royal Society
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
brain size, birds, biparental care, pair bonding, altricial development, parental investment, life history evolution, correlated evolution, social bonds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review