The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ARTHROPOD PHYLOGENY: A COMBINED APPROACH
Abstract
Abstract- Ribosomal and ubiquitin protein coding sequence data are generated from 20 arthropods and five close relatives. These molecular data are combined with morphological characters derived from the literature to approach arthropod phylogenetics from the perspective of total evidence. Trilobita were included in the analysis through morphological comparison alone. The overall data strongly support arthropod monophyly. Recent molecular analyses which have yield different results are shown to have been based on few characters, few taxa or both. The most parsimonious explanation of the data is (Annelida + (Onychophora + (Trilobita + Chelicerata) + (Crustacea + (Myriapoda + Hexapoda))))). The data are largely concordant both internally among data sets and externally with previous cladistic anatomical analyses.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The coherence of the Arthropoda as a clade was not supported by some earlier molecular studies, although subsequent investigations have re-established the monophyly of the group”
From The Cambrian evolutionary ‘explosion’: decoupling cladogenesis from morphological disparity (1996) · cites this paper as Wheeler, Cartwright & Hayashi, 1993
Citations
Cites
Needleman, S. B., & Wunsch, C. D. (1970) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4 · Cited by 11,288
Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: evolutionary and phylogenetic implications.
(1988) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040480 · Cited by 234
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Abele L. G., 1989, Molecular evidence For the inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the Crustacea, Mol. Biol. Evol., 6, 685
- Allard M. W., 1991, The production of single‐stranded DNA suitable for sequencing using the polymerase chain reaction, BioTechniques, 56, 779
- Anderson D. T., 1973, Embryology and Phylogeny in Annelids and Arthropods
- Anderson D. T., 1979, Arthropod Phylogeny, 59
- Bergström J., 1979, Arthropod Phylogeny, 3
- Boudreaux H. B., 1979, Arthropod Phylogeny with Special Reference to Insects
- 10.1126/science.246.4927.241 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.256.5064.1670 · DOI · Paper page
- Brusca R. C., 1990, Invertebrates
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00476.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.186.4158.13 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01953812 · DOI
- Eldredge N., 1974, Revision of the suborder Synziphosurina (Chelicerata, Merostomata), with remarks on merostome phylogeny, Amer. Mus. Nov., 2543, 1
- 10.1126/science.250.4981.667 · DOI
- 10.2307/2412182 · DOI
- Farris J. S., 1981, Advances in Cladistics: Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, 3
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1985.tb00411.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1986.tb00449.x · DOI
- Farris J. S., 1988, Program and Documentation
- 10.1126/science.3277277 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.155.3760.279 · DOI
- Hennig W., 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics
- Hennig W., 1981, Insect Phylogeny
- Hyman L. H., 1967, Mollusca I. Aplacophora, Polyplacophora, Monoplacophora, Gastropoda
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00520.x · DOI
- 10.2307/1548664 · DOI
- King P. E., 1973, Pycnogonids
- 10.2307/2992432 · DOI
- Kristensen N. P., 1975, The phylogeny of hexapod “orders”, A critical review of recent accounts. Z. Zool. Evol. Forch., 13, 1
- 10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.001031 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.87.2.763 · DOI
- Lee H. J., 1988, Mol, Cell. Biol., 8, 4727
- 10.1098/rstb.1964.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1966.tb00501.x · DOI
- Manton S. M., 1972, The evolution of arthropodan locomotory mechanisms, Part 10. Locomotory habits, morphology and evolution of the hexapod classes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 51, 203
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1973.tb07519.x · DOI
- Manton S. M., 1979, Arthropod Phylogeny, 387
- Mickevtch M. F., 1981, The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst, Zool., 30, 351
- Nixon K., 1992, CLADOS, Version 1.2
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1990.tb00541.x · DOI
- Paulus H. F., 1979, Arthropod phylogeny, 299
- Pocock R. J., 1983, On the classification of the tracheate Arthropoda, Zool. Anz., 16, 271
- 10.1080/08912969009386546 · DOI
- 10.1038/351225a0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · DOI · Paper page
- Schram F. R., 1978, Arthropods: a convergent phenomenon, Fieldiana Geology, 39, 61
- Schram F. R., 1986, Crustacea
- 10.1016/0169-5347(87)90108-X · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1990.tb00523.x · DOI
- Siebold C. T. W., 1848, Lehrbuch der vergliechenden Anatomie der Wirbellosen Tiere
- Snodgrass R. E., 1938, Evolution of the Annelida, Onychophora and Arthropoda, Smiths. Misc. Coll., 97, 1
- Snodgrass R. E., 1952, A Textbook of Arthropod Anatomy
- Swofford D. L., 1981, Advances in Cladistics: Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Willi Hennig Society, 25
- Tautz D., 1988, Complete sequence of the rRNA genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol, Biol. Evol., 5, 366
- Tiegs O. W., 1947, The development and affinities of the Pauropoda, based on a study of Pauropus silvaticus, Q. J. Micr. Sci., 82, 165
- 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1958.tb01258.x · DOI
- Turbeville J. M., 1991, The phylogenetic status of the arthropods, as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences, Mol. Biol. Evol., 8, 669
- Weycoldt P., 1979, Arthropod Phylogeny, 107
- 10.1111/j.1439-0469.1986.tb00613.x · DOI
- Weygoldt P., 1979, Untersuchungen zur Morphologie, Taxonomie und Phylogenie der Chelicerata. II. Cladogramme und die Enfaltung der Chelicerata. Z. Zool. Syst, Evol., 17, 117
- Wheeler W. C., 1992, Extinction and Cladistic Analysis, 205
- Wheeler W. C., 1992, MALIGN, Version 1.01
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Peterson, K. J., & Eernisse, D. J. (2001) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003003170.x · Cited by 529
Origin of Bilaterian Body Plans: Evolution of Developmental Regulatory Mechanisms
Davidson, E. H., Peterson, K. J., & Cameron, R. A. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5240.1319 · Cited by 381
The Phylogeny of the Extant Hexapod Orders
Wheeler, W. C., Whiting, M., Wheeler, Q. D., & Carpenter, J. M. (2001) · Cladistics · doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2001.tb00115.x · Cited by 508
Self-citationThe cambrian evolutionary ‘explosion’ recalibrated
Fortey, R. A., Briggs, D. E. G., & Wills, M. A. (1997) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.950190510 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, W. C., Cartwright, P., & Hayashi, C. Y.
- Affiliations
- American Museum of Natural History (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wheeler, Ward C.
- Venue
- Cladistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-39
- ISSN
- 0748-3007 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-0031
- OpenAlex
- W2087350017
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 30.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cladistics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- arthropod phylogeny, ribosomal DNA, total evidence, trilobites, Annelida, Onychophora, Chelicerata, Crustacea, Myriapoda, Hexapoda, morphological characters, parsimony analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review