Cited by 1,039Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPlant Diversity and Evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analyzing Large Data Sets in Reasonable Times: Solutions for Composite Optima

Open access
Goloboff, Pablo A.·1999·Cladistics

Abstract

New methods for parsimony analysis of large data sets are presented. The new methods are sectorial searches, tree‐drifting, and tree‐fusing. For Chase et al. 's 500‐taxon data set these methods (on a 266‐MHz Pentium II) find a shortest tree in less than 10 min (i.e., over 15,000 times faster than PAUP and 1000 times faster than PAUP*). Making a complete parsimony analysis requires hitting minimum length several times independently, but not necessarily all “islands” for Chase et al. 's data set, this can be done in 4 to 6 h. The new methods also perform well in other cases analyzed (which range from 170 to 854 taxa).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1096-0031.1999.tb00278.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Swofford D., 1993, Program and documentation. Laboratory of Molecular Systematics
  2. Swofford D., 1998, PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods), version 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,039

Metadata

Authors
Goloboff, P. A.
Affiliations
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR)
Corresponding author
Goloboff, Pablo A.
Venue
Cladistics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
415-428
ISSN
  • 0748-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-0031
OpenAlex
W2106179083
Cited by
1,039
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 55
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cladistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Washington
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
parsimony analysis, large data sets, phylogenetic tree search, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review