Cited by 193Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Growth curve of Psittacosaurus mongoliensis Osborn (Ceratopsia: Psittacosauridae) inferred from long bone histology

ERICKSON, GREGORY M., TUMANOVA, TATYANA A.·2000·Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society

Abstract

The skeleton undergoes substantial histological modification during ontogeny in association with longitudinal growth, shape changes, reproductive activity, and fatigue repair. This variation can hinder attempts to reconstruct life history attributes for individuals, particularly when only fossil materials are availble for study. Histological examinations of multiple elements throughout development provide a means to control for such variability and facilitate accurate life history assessments. In the present study, the microstructure of various major long bones of the ceratopsian Psittacosaurus monogoliensis Osborn were examined from a growth series spanning juvenile through adult developmental stages. The first reconstruction of a growth curve (mass vs. age) for a dinosaur was made for this taxon using a new method called Developmental Mass Extrapolation. The results suggest P. mongoliensis: (1) had an S-shaped growth curve characteristics of most extant vertebrates, and (2) had maximal growth rates that exceeded extant reptiles and marsupials, but were slower than most avian and eutherian taxa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2000.tb02201.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whole body maximal growth rates for non-avialan dinosaurs are within the range expected for endotherms.

    “Erickson and colleagues [31], [44], [45] have shown that whole body maximal growth rates for non-avialan dinosaurs are within the range expected for endotherms.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ERICKSON, G. M., & TUMANOVA, T. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Corresponding author
ERICKSON, GREGORY M.
Venue
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
Published
2000-12
Volume
130
Issue
4
Pages
551-566
ISSN
0024-4082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044005382
Cited by
193
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
  • University of California Museum of Paleontology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
growth curves, long bone histology, S-curve, growth rate, life history, dinosaur fossils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review