The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenetic relationships among sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada): the craniodental evidence
Open accessAbstract
This study is undertaken in order to evaluate specific hypotheses of relationship among extant and extinct sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada).Questions of particular interest include the relationship among the three traditional family groupings of extinct ground sloths and the monophyletic or diphyletic origin of the two genera of extant tree sloths.A computer-based cladistic investigation of the phylogenetic relationships among 33 sloth genera is performed based upon 286 osteological characteristics of the skull, lower jaw, dentition and hyoid arch.Characters are polarized via comparisons with the following successive outgroups, all members of the supraordinal grouping Edentata: the Vermilingua, or anteaters; the Cingulata, or armadillos and glyptodonts; the Palaeanodonta; and the Pholidota, or pangolins.The results of the analysis strongly corroborate the diphyly of living tree sloths, with the three-toed sloth Bradypus positioned as the sister-taxon to all other sloths, and the two-toed sloth Choloepus allied with extinct members of the family Megalonychidae.These results imply that the split between the two extant sloth genera is ancient, dating back perhaps as much as 40 Myr, and that the similarities between the two taxa, including their suspensory locomotor habits, present one of the most dramatic examples of convergent evolution known among mammals.The monophyly of the three traditional ground sloth families Megatheriidae, Megalonychidae and Mylodontidae is confirmed in the present study, and the late Miocene-Pleistocene nothrotheres are shown to form a clade.It is suggested that this latter clade merits recognition as a distinct family-level grouping, the family Nothrotheriidae.The monophyly of the Megatherioidea, a clade including members of the families Megatheriidae, Megalonychidae and Nothrotheriidae, is also supported.Within Megatherioidea, the families Nothrotheriidae and Megatheriidae form a monophyletic group called the Megatheria.The relationships within the families Megatheriidae and Mylodontidae are fully and consistently resolved, although the hypothesized scheme of relationships among the late Miocene to Pleistocene members of the mylodontid subfamily Mylodontinae differ strongly from any proposed by previous authors.Within the family Megalonychidae, Choloepus is allied to a monophyletic grouping of West Indian sloths, although the relationships within this clade are not fully resolved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PAUP (phylogenetic analysis using parsimony)
(2008) · Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Informatics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6754-9_12413 · Cited by 4,412
Nowak, R. (1999) · doi:10.56021/9780801857898 · Cited by 4,102
An Empirical Test of Bootstrapping as a Method for Assessing Confidence in Phylogenetic Analysis
Hillis, D. M., & Bull, J. J. (1993) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182 · Cited by 3,631
An Empirical Test of Bootstrapping as a Method for Assessing Confidence in Phylogenetic Analysis
Hillis, D. M., & Bull, J. J. (1993) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.2307/2992540 · Cited by 3,423
BRANCH SUPPORT AND TREE STABILITY
Bremer, K. (1994) · Cladistics · doi:10.1006/clad.1994.1019 · Cited by 2,903
The principles of classification and a classification of mammals
Simpson, G. G. (1945) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18028696 · Cited by 2,529
Classification of mammals: above the species level
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5657 · Cited by 2,118
Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution
Ostrom, J. H., & Carroll, R. L. (1988) · PALAIOS · doi:10.2307/3514548 · Cited by 1,665
Templeton, A. R. (1983) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05533.x · Cited by 1,559
Outgroup Analysis and Parsimony
Maddison, W. P., Donoghue, M. J., & Maddison, D. R. (1984) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/33.1.83 · Cited by 982
Cited by
How many species of mammals are there?
Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L., & Upham, N. S. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyx147 · Cited by 1,168
Delsuc, F., Vizcaíno, S. F., & Douzery, E. J. (2004) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-4-11 · Cited by 212
Humeral Cross‐Sectional Shape in Suspensory Primates and Sloths
Patel, B. A., Ruff, C. B., Simons, E. L. R., & Organ, J. M. (2013) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.22669 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- GAUDIN, T. J.
- Venue
- Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 255-305
- ISSN
- 0024-4082 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-3642
- OpenAlex
- W2024201410
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogenetic relationships among sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada): the craniodental evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2003.00100.x
- The paper
- GAUDIN, T. J. (2004). Phylogenetic relationships among sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada): the craniodental evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2003.00100.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.