Cited by 27Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceDNA Repair MechanismsHair Growth and Disorders

Random Segregation of DNA Strands in Epidermal Basal Cells

Open access
Kuroki, Toshio, Murakami, Yoshinori·1989·Japanese Journal of Cancer Research

Abstract

According to the hypothesis proposed by Cairns, stem cells retain the older of the two parental DNA strands, whereas differentiating daughter cells receive the newly synthesized strand, so that a set of “immortal strands” persists in stem cells through successive cell divisions. To test this hypothesis, five successive divisions were induced in basal epidermal cells in vivo by two injections of cholera toxin into mouse skin and cells labeled with [3 H]thymidine at the first cell cycle were chased for 50 days. If selective segregation occurs, the labeled strand should be transferred into a non‐stem daughter cell after the second division and labeled cells would eventually be eliminated from the epidermis. However, the results suggest random segregation of DNA strands in epidermal basal cells. Labeled basal cells were persistently present throughout the whole epidermis for 50 days. Furthermore, labeled mitotic cells were found after the third division and their numbers of grains decreased exponentially through 5 cycles of divisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb01690.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence of asymmetric chromosome segregation was lacking in certain studies of epidermal stem cells and ISCs.

    “evidence of asymmetric chromosome segregation was lacking in certain studies of epidermal stem cells136,137 and ISCs138.”

    From Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence (2013) · cites this paper as [137]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuroki, T., & Murakami, Y.
Affiliations
Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Japanese Journal of Cancer Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-07
Volume
80
Issue
7
Pages
637-642
ISSN
0910-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982813112
Cited by
27
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Japanese Journal of Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
Keywords
epidermal basal cells, stem cells, DNA synthesis, 3H-thymidine labeling, cholera toxin, cell cycle, mouse skin
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Animals, Autoradiography, Cell Compartmentation, Cell Division, Cholera Toxin, DNA, Female, Mitosis, Stem Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review