Cited by 67Hair Growth and DisordersMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

The Majority of Multipotent Epidermal Stem Cells Do Not Protect Their Genome by Asymmetrical Chromosome Segregation

Sotiropoulou, Panagiota A., Candi, Aurélie, Blanpain, Cédric·2008·Stem Cells

Abstract

The maintenance of genome integrity in stem cells (SCs) is critical for preventing cancer formation and cellular senescence. The immortal strand hypothesis postulates that SCs protect their genome by keeping the same DNA strand throughout life by asymmetrical cell divisions, thus avoiding accumulation of mutations that can arise during DNA replication. The in vivo relevance of this model remains to date a matter of intense debate. In this study, we revisited this long-standing hypothesis, by analyzing how multipotent hair follicle (HF) SCs segregate their DNA strands during morphogenesis, skin homeostasis, and SC activation. We used three different in vivo approaches to determine how HF SCs segregate their DNA strand during cell divisions. Double-labeling studies using pulse-chase experiments during morphogenesis and the first adult hair cycle showed that HF SCs incorporate two different nucleotide analogs, contradictory to the immortal strand hypothesis. The co-segregation of DNA and chromatin labeling during pulse-chase experiments demonstrated that label retention in HF SCs is rather a mark of relative quiescence. Moreover, DNA labeling of adult SCs, similar to labeling during morphogenesis, also resulted in label retention in HF SCs, indicating that chromosome segregation occurs randomly in most of these cells. Altogether, our results demonstrate that DNA strand segregation occurs randomly in the majority of HF SCs during development, tissue homeostasis, and following SC activation. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0634

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence of asymmetric chromosome segregation was lacking in certain studies of epidermal stem cells and ISCs.

    “evidence of asymmetric chromosome segregation was lacking in certain studies of epidermal stem cells136,137 and ISCs138.”

    From Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence (2013) · cites this paper as [136]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sotiropoulou, P. A., Candi, A., & Blanpain, C.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Blanpain, Cédric
Venue
Stem Cells
Published
2008-09-04
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
2964-2973
ISSN
  • 1066-5099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-4918
OpenAlex
W2024790458
Cited by
67
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stem Cells (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schlumberger Foundation
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Fonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’Agriculture
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
asymmetric cell division, epidermal stem cells, hair follicle stem cells, genome stability, stem cell quiescence, label retention, pulse-chase labeling, hair follicle morphogenesis, skin homeostasis, stem cell activation
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Animals, Cell Division, Chromatin, DNA Damage, Keratinocytes, Hair Follicle, Chromosome Segregation, Multipotent Stem Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review