Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 549

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score

CONIGRAVE, KATHERINE M., HALL, WAYNE D., SAUNDERS, JOHN B.·1995·Addiction

Abstract

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is a 10-item questionnaire designed by the World Health Organization to screen for hazardous alcohol intake in primary health care settings. In this longitudinal study we examine its performance in predicting alcohol-related harm over the full range of its scores using receiver operating characteristic analyses. Three hundred and thirty ambulatory care patients were interviewed using a detailed assessment schedule which included the AUDIT questions. After 2-3 years, subjects were reviewed and their experience of alcohol-related medical and social harm assessed by interview and perusal of medical records. AUDIT was a good predictor of both alcohol-related social and medical problems. Cut-off points of 7-8 maximized discrimination in the prediction a trauma and hypertension. Higher cut-offs (12 and 22) provided better discrimination in the prediction of alcohol-related social problems and of liver disease or gastrointestinal bleeding, but high specificity was offset by reduced sensitivity. We conclude that the recommended cut-off score of eight is a reasonable approximation to the optimal for a variety of endpoints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb03552.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. World Health Organization, 1992, Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines
  2. Saunders J. B., 1987, Report on Phase I. Development of a Screening Instrument
  3. Babor T. F., 1989, AUDIT-the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test: Guidelines for Use in Primary Health care
  4. 10.1016/0306-4603(76)90018-6 · doi:10.1016/0306-4603(76)90018-6
  5. 10.1001/archinte.144.5.1045 · doi:10.1001/archinte.144.5.1045
  6. SPSDS, 1986, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences SPSSx
  7. SPSS, 1993, SPSS for Windows. Release 6.0
  8. Wilkinson L., 1987, SYSTAT: The System for Statistics
  9. Williams A. T., 1978, Medical Journal of Australia, 2, 608, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1978.tb131777.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 549

Metadata

Authors
CONIGRAVE, K. M., HALL, W. D., & SAUNDERS, J. B.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10
Volume
90
Issue
10
Pages
1349-1356
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2160759864
Cited by
549
References
13
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm, 7275 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb03552.x
The paper
CONIGRAVE, K. M., HALL, W. D., & SAUNDERS, J. B. (1995). The AUDIT questionnaire: choosing a cut-off score. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb03552.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.