Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized controlled trial of a web‐based computer‐tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy

Open access
Strecher, Victor J., Shiffman, Saul, West, Robert·2005·Addiction

Abstract

Aim To assess the efficacy of World Wide Web‐based tailored behavioral smoking cessation materials among nicotine patch users. Design Two‐group randomized controlled trial. Setting World Wide Web in England and Republic of Ireland. Participants A total of 3971 subjects who purchased a particular brand of nicotine patch and logged‐on to use a free web‐based behavioral support program. Intervention Web‐based tailored behavioral smoking cessation materials or web‐based non‐tailored materials. Measurements Twenty‐eight‐day continuous abstinence rates were assessed by internet‐based survey at 6‐week follow‐up and 10‐week continuous rates at 12‐week follow‐up. Findings Using three approaches to the analyses of 6‐ and 12‐week outcomes, participants in the tailored condition reported clinically and statistically significantly higher continuous abstinence rates than participants in the non‐tailored condition. In our primary analyses using as a denominator all subjects who logged‐on to the treatment site at least once, continuous abstinence rates at 6 weeks were 29.0% in the tailored condition versus 23.9% in the non‐tailored condition (OR = 1.30; P = 0.0006); at 12 weeks continuous abstinence rates were 22.8% versus 18.1%, respectively (OR = 1.34; P = 0.0006). Moreover, satisfaction with the program was significantly higher in the tailored than in the non‐tailored condition. Conclusions The results of this study demonstrate a benefit of the web‐based tailored behavioral support materials used in conjunction with nicotine replacement therapy. A web‐based program that collects relevant information from users and tailors the intervention to their specific needs had significant advantages over a web‐based non‐tailored cessation program.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01093.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Strecher, V. J., Shiffman, S., & West, R.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-22
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
682-688
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2115309381
Cited by
308
References
3
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized controlled trial of a web‐based computer‐tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01093.x
The paper
Strecher, V. J., Shiffman, S., & West, R. (2005). Randomized controlled trial of a web‐based computer‐tailored smoking cessation program as a supplement to nicotine patch therapy. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01093.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.