Cited by 829Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation

Open access
Stead, Lindsay F, Koilpillai, Priya, Fanshawe, Thomas R, Lancaster, Tim·2016·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both behavioural support (including brief advice and counselling) and pharmacotherapies (including nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline and bupropion) are effective in helping people to stop smoking. Combining both treatment approaches is recommended where possible, but the size of the treatment effect with different combinations and in different settings and populations is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of combining behavioural support and medication to aid smoking cessation, compared to a minimal intervention or usual care, and to identify whether there are different effects depending on characteristics of the treatment setting, intervention, population treated, or take-up of treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialised Register in July 2015 for records with any mention of pharmacotherapy, including any type of NRT, bupropion, nortriptyline or varenicline. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials evaluating combinations of pharmacotherapy and behavioural support for smoking cessation, compared to a control receiving usual care or brief advice or less intensive behavioural support. We excluded trials recruiting only pregnant women, trials recruiting only adolescents, and trials with less than six months follow-up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Search results were prescreened by one author and inclusion or exclusion of potentially relevant trials was agreed by two authors. Data was extracted by one author and checked by another.The main outcome measure was abstinence from smoking after at least six months of follow-up. We used the most rigorous definition of abstinence for each trial, and biochemically validated rates if available. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each study. Where appropriate, we performed meta-analysis using a Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. MAIN RESULTS: Fifty-three studies with a total of more than 25,000 participants met the inclusion criteria. A large proportion of studies recruited people in healthcare settings or with specific health needs. Most studies provided NRT. Behavioural support was typically provided by specialists in cessation counselling, who offered between four and eight contact sessions. The planned maximum duration of contact was typically more than 30 minutes but less than 300 minutes. Overall, studies were at low or unclear risk of bias, and findings were not sensitive to the exclusion of any of the six studies rated at high risk of bias in one domain. One large study (the Lung Health Study) contributed heterogeneity due to a substantially larger treatment effect than seen in other studies (RR 3.88, 95% CI 3.35 to 4.50). Since this study used a particularly intensive intervention which included extended availability of nicotine gum, multiple group sessions and long term maintenance and recycling contacts, the results may not be comparable with the interventions used in other studies, and hence it was not pooled in other analyses. Based on the remaining 52 studies (19,488 participants) there was high quality evidence (using GRADE) for a benefit of combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural treatment compared to usual care, brief advice or less intensive behavioural support (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.68 to 1.98) with moderate statistical heterogeneity (I² = 36%).The pooled estimate for 43 trials that recruited participants in healthcare settings (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.18) was higher than for eight trials with community-based recruitment (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.76). Compared to the first version of the review, previous weak evidence of differences in other subgroup analyses has disappeared. We did not detect differences between subgroups defined by motivation to quit, treatment provider, number or duration of support sessions, or take-up of treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Interventions that combine pharmacotherapy and behavioural support increase smoking cessation success compared to a minimal intervention or usual care. Updating this review with an additional 12 studies (5,000 participants) did not materially change the effect estimate. Although trials differed in the details of their populations and interventions, we did not detect any factors that modified treatment effects apart from the recruitment setting. We did not find evidence from indirect comparisons that offering more intensive behavioural support was associated with larger treatment effects.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd008286.pub3

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite adding nearly 5 more years of research since the previous review, the effect estimates for each pooled comparison have been remarkably stable for at least the past three decades.

    “Furthermore, despite adding nearly 5 more years of research since the previous review,[5](#R5),[6](#R6) the effect estimates for each pooled comparison have been remarkably stable for at least the past three decades.”

    From Interventions for Tobacco Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Persons (2021) · cites this paper as [6]

    The review’s “What’s new” section says twelve studies were added in 2016 with “no material change to pooled estimates,” supporting stability since the previous review. Its History section dates that review to 2012, not nearly five years earlier, and does not establish that estimates for each pooled comparison were stable for three decades. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The pooled risk ratio for smoking abstinence at 6 months or more for combined pharmacotherapy plus behavioral support versus usual care or minimal support control groups was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.68 to 1.98; 52 trials; n=19,488).

    “The pooled risk ratio (RR) for smoking abstinence at 6 months or more for combined pharmacotherapy plus behavioral support versus usual care or minimal support control groups was 1.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68 to 1.98; 52 trials; n=19,488).[58](#R58)”
  • At the longest follow-up, 15.2% (1529 out of 10070) of participants in the intervention group remained abstinent, compared to 8.6% (808 out of 9418) in the control group.

    “At the longest follow‐up, 15.2% (1529 out of 10070) of participants in the intervention group remained abstinent, compared to 8.6% (808 out of 9418) in the control group [40].”
  • In the general population, interventions that combine pharmacotherapy and behavioral support increase smoking cessation success.

    “In the general population, interventions that combine pharmacotherapy and behavioral support increase smoking cessation success.”
  • A number of studies have demonstrated benefits of combined behavioral therapy and pharmacological cessation aids.

    “While a number of studies have demonstrated the benefits of the combined use of behavioral therapy and pharmacological cessation aids (see Fiore et al., 2008; Stead et al., 2016)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Javitz HS, Swan GE, Zbikowski SM, Curry SJ, McAfee TA, Decker DL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of different combinations of bupropion SR dose and behavioral treatment for smoking cessation: a societal perspective. American Journal of Managed Care 2004;10:217-26.
  2. Swan GE, Jack LM, Curry S, Chorost M, Javitz H, McAfee T, et al. Bupropion SR and counseling for smoking cessation in actual practice: Predictors of outcome. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2003;5:911-21.
  3. Swan GE, Jack LM, Javitz HS, McAfee T, McClure JB. Predictors of 12-month outcome in smokers who received bupropion sustained-release for smoking cessation. Central Nervous System Drugs 2008;22(3):239-56.
  4. Swan GE, Javitz HS, Jack LM, Curry SJ, McAfee T. Heterogeneity in 12-month outcome among female and male smokers. Addiction 2004;99:237-50.
  5. Swan GE, McAfee T, Curry SJ, Jack LM, Javitz H, Dacey S, et al. Effectiveness of bupropion sustained release for smoking cessation in a health care setting: a randomized trial. Archives of Internal Medicine 2003;163:2337-44.
  6. Swan GE, Valdes AM, Ring HZ, Khroyan TV, Jack LM, Ton CC, et al. Dopamine receptor DRD2 genotype and smoking cessation outcome following treatment with bupropion SR. Pharmacogenomics Journal 2005;5:21-9.
  7. Swan 2010 {published data only} Catz SL, Jack LM, McClure JB, Javitz HS, Deprey M, Zbikowski SM, et al. Adherence to varenicline in the COMPASS smoking cessation intervention trial. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2011;13(5):361-8.
  8. Halperin AC, McAfee TA, Jack LM, Catz SL, McClure JB, Deprey TM, et al. Impact of symptoms experienced by varenicline users on tobacco treatment in a real world setting. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2009;36(4):428-34.
  9. McClure JB, Jack L, Deprey M, Catz S, McAfee T, Zbikowski S, et al. Canary in a coal mine? Interest in bupropion SR use among smokers in the COMPASS trial. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 2008;10(12):1815-16.
  10. McClure JB, Swan GE, Jack L, Catz SL, Zbikowski SM, McAfee TA, et al. Mood, side-effects and smoking outcomes among persons with and without probable lifetime depression taking varenicline. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2009;24(5):563-69.
  11. Hughes JR. Combining behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation: an update. NIDA Research Monograph 1995;150:92-109.
  12. Kotz D, Brown J, West R. Prospective cohort study of the effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments used in the "real world". Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2014;89(10):1360-7.
  13. Reus VI, Smith BJ. Multimodal techniques for smoking cessation: a review of their efficacy and utilisation and clinical practice guidelines. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2008;62(11):1753-68.
  14. Rigotti NA, Clair C, Munafò MR, Stead LF. Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001837.pub3] · DOI
  15. Schulz 2002b Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. The Lancet 2002;359(9306):614-8.
  16. Shiffman S, Brockwell SE, Pillitteri JL, Gitchell JG. Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008;34(2):102-11.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stead, L. F., Koilpillai, P., Fanshawe, T. R., & Lancaster, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-03-24
Volume
2016
Issue
3
Pages
CD008286-CD008286
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W2029849221
Cited by
829
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline, bupropion, nortriptyline, smoking abstinence, treatment effect heterogeneity, risk of bias, healthcare settings, brief advice, demographic factors, treatment intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Smoking, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review