Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Naltrexone versus acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a multi‐centre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial

Morley, Kirsten C., Teesson, Maree, Reid, Sophie C., Sannibale, Claudia, Thomson, Clare, Phung, Nghi, Weltman, Martin, Bell, James R., Richardson, Kylie, Haber, Paul S.·2006·Addiction

Abstract

Aim To compare the efficacy of acamprosate and naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence. Design A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Setting Three treatment centres in Australia. Participants A total of 169 alcohol dependent subjects were given naltrexone (50 mg/day), acamprosate (1998 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Intervention All subjects were offered manualized compliance therapy, a brief intervention that targets problems that may affect treatment compliance such as ambivalence and misperceptions about medication. Measurements Time to the first drink, time to first relapse, drinks per drinking day and cumulative abstinence. Findings In intention‐to‐treat analyses, there were no differences between groups on outcome measures of drinking, craving or biochemical markers. Similarly, analyses of the 94 subjects that completed the study in full and demonstrated 80% compliance, revealed no significant treatment effects. Differential treatment effects were identified after stratification according to scores on the Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS) and Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS). A significant beneficial treatment effect on time to first relapse was revealed for subjects with ‘no depression’ allocated to naltrexone (n = 56; P < 0.01). In addition, a significant beneficial treatment effect was revealed in subjects with ‘low dependence’ allocated to naltrexone (n = 34; P < 0.05). Conclusions The results of this study support the efficacy of naltrexone in the relapse prevention of alcoholism amongst those with low levels of clinical depression and alcohol dependence severity. No effect of acamprosate was found in our sample.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01555.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Morley, K. C., Teesson, M., Reid, S. C., Sannibale, C., Thomson, C., Phung, N., Weltman, M., Bell, J. R., Richardson, K., & Haber, P. S.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09
Volume
101
Issue
10
Pages
1451-1462
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1982373189
Cited by
165
References
8
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Naltrexone versus acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a multi‐centre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01555.x
The paper
Morley, K. C., Teesson, M., Reid, S. C., Sannibale, C., Thomson, C., Phung, N., Weltman, M., Bell, J. R., Richardson, K., & Haber, P. S. (2006). Naltrexone versus acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence: a multi‐centre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Addiction. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01555.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.