Cited by 176Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

The natural course of cannabis use, abuse and dependence during the first decades of life

Perkonigg, Axel, Goodwin, Renee D., Fiedler, Agnes, Behrendt, Silke, Beesdo, Katja, Lieb, Roselind, Wittchen, Hans‐Ulrich·2008·Addiction

Abstract

Aims There has been little available information on the long-term natural course, persistence and remission of cannabis use, abuse and dependence. The current study estimated rates and risk factors associated with stability and variation in cannabis use patterns, cannabis abuse and cannabis dependence in a community sample over a 10-year period. Design, setting and participants Prospective longitudinal, epidemiological study with a 4- and 10-year follow-up of a community sample (n = 3021) aged 14-24 years at baseline in Munich, Germany. Measurements Cannabis use, abuse and dependence and associated risk factors were assessed by face-to-face interviews using the Munich Composite International Diagnostic Interview. Findings At baseline, one-third of the sample (34.2%) had used cannabis at least once. The cumulative incidence of cannabis use 10 years later was 50.7%. Fifty-six per cent of all repeated users (five times or more) at baseline reported cannabis use at 4-year follow-up. Ten years later, this proportion had decreased slightly to only 46.3%. Repeated (five times or more) users were almost three times more likely to report repeated use at 10-year follow up (OR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.6-4.7), compared with those who had used cannabis fewer times. Peer use of cannabis, life-events and alcohol dependence also predicted use of cannabis at 10-year follow-up. Conclusions Among youth who have used cannabis repeatedly (five times or more) cannabis use is fairly stable and rates of re…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02064.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkonigg, A., Goodwin, R. D., Fiedler, A., Behrendt, S., Beesdo, K., Lieb, R., & Wittchen, H.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Perkonigg, Axel
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-05
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
439-449
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2022847490
Cited by
176
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 15
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
cannabis use, cannabis use disorder, remission, adolescents and young adults, peer influence, life events, alcoholism, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Marijuana Abuse, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review