Cited by 216Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSmoking Behavior and Cessation

Reaching out towards cannabis: approach-bias in heavy cannabis users predicts changes in cannabis use

Open access
Cousijn, Janna, Goudriaan, Anna E., Wiers, Reinout W.·2011·Addiction

Abstract

Aims Repeated drug exposure can lead to an approach‐bias, i.e. the relatively automatically triggered tendencies to approach rather that avoid drug‐related stimuli. Our main aim was to study this approach‐bias in heavy cannabis users with the newly developed cannabis Approach Avoidance Task (cannabis‐AAT) and to investigate the predictive relationship between an approach‐bias for cannabis‐related materials and levels of cannabis use, craving, and the course of cannabis use. Design, settings and participants Cross‐sectional assessment and six‐month follow‐up in 32 heavy cannabis users and 39 non‐using controls. Measurements Approach and avoidance action‐tendencies towards cannabis and neutral images were assessed with the cannabis AAT. During the AAT, participants pulled or pushed a joystick in response to image orientation. To generate additional sense of approach or avoidance, pulling the joystick increased picture size while pushing decreased it. Craving was measured pre‐ and post‐test with the multi‐factorial Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (MCQ). Cannabis use frequencies and levels of dependence were measured at baseline and after a six‐month follow‐up. Findings Heavy cannabis users demonstrated an approach‐bias for cannabis images, as compared to controls. The approach‐bias predicted changes in cannabis use at six‐month follow‐up. The pre‐test MCQ emotionality and expectancy factor were associated negatively with the approach‐bias. No effects were found on levels of cannabis dependence. Conclusions Heavy cannabis users with a strong approach‐bias for cannabis are more likely to increase their cannabis use. This approach‐bias could be used as a predictor of the course of cannabis use to identify individuals at risk from increasing cannabis use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03475.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6]6. Robinson T. E., Berridge K. C. Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol 2003; 54 : 25-53.
  2. [54]54. McPartland J. M., Blanchon D. J., Musty R. E. Cannabimimetic effects modulated by cholinergic compounds. Addict Biol 2008; 13 : 411-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cousijn, J., Goudriaan, A. E., & Wiers, R. W.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Cousijn, Janna
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-05
Volume
106
Issue
9
Pages
1667-1674
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2160224213
Cited by
216
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
approach bias, cannabis use, heavy cannabis users, drug craving, cannabis use disorder, approach-avoidance tendencies, risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Avoidance Learning, Marijuana Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cues, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Netherlands, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Smoking, Behavior, Addictive, Disease Progression, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review