Cited by 126Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivation and patch treatment for HIV+ smokers: a randomized controlled trial

Open access

Abstract

Aims To test the efficacy of two smoking cessation interventions in a HIV positive (HIV+) sample: standard care (SC) treatment plus nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) versus more intensive motivationally enhanced (ME) treatment plus NRT. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting HIV+ smoker referrals from eight immunology clinics in the northeastern United States. Participants A total of 444 participants enrolled in the study (mean age = 42.07 years; 63.28% male; 51.80% European American; mean cigarettes/day = 18.27). Interventions SC participants received two brief sessions with a health educator. Those setting a quit date received self‐help quitting materials and NRT. ME participants received four sessions of motivational counseling and a quit‐day counseling call. All ME intervention materials were tailored to the needs of HIV+ individuals. Measurements Biochemically verified 7‐day abstinence rates at 2‐month, 4‐month and 6‐month follow‐ups. Findings Intent‐to‐treat (ITT) abstinence rates at 2‐month, 4‐month and 6‐month follow‐ups were 12%, 9% and 9%, respectively, in the ME condition, and 13%, 10% and 10%, respectively, in the SC condition, indicating no between‐group differences. Among 412 participants with treatment utilization data, 6‐month ITT abstinence rates were associated positively with low nicotine dependence (P = 0.02), high motivation to quit (P = 0.04) and Hispanic American race/ethnicity (P = 0.02). Adjusting for these variables, each additional NRT contact improved the odds of smoking abstinence by a third (odds ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.99–1.75). Conclusions Motivationally enhanced treatment plus NRT did not improve cessation rates over and above standard care treatment plus NRT in this HIV+ sample of smokers. Providers offering brief support and encouraging use of nicotine replacement may be able to help HIV+ patients to quit smoking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02623.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), 2007, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report
  2. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), World Health Organization (WHO), 2008, North American, Western and Central Europe: AIDS Epidemic Update Regional Summary
  3. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), 2008, 2008 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic (UNAIDS/08.27E/JC1511E)
  4. US Department of Health and Human Services (USDHHS), 2003, Clearing the Air: Quit Smoking Today
  5. Morrow K., 2000, Barriers and Benefits of Smoking Cessation among HIV‐Positive Individuals: a Qualitative Investigation
  6. 10.1037/0278-6133.10.5.360 · DOI
  7. Shepard D. S., 2002, Assessing Costs and Time of Counseling Services for HIV+ Patients

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–126 of 126

Metadata

Authors
Lloyd‐Richardson, E. E., Stanton, C. A., Papandonatos, G. D., Shadel, W. G., Stein, M., Tashima, K., Flanigan, T., Morrow, K., Neighbors, C., & Niaura, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Lloyd‐Richardson, Elizabeth E.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-09
Volume
104
Issue
11
Pages
1891-1900
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2066729021
Cited by
125
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL069987)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA12344-06, R01DA012344)
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA095623, P50CA084719)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI042853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, motivation enhancement, motivational counseling, nicotine dependence, abstinence rates, brief intervention, Hispanic Americans, race and ethnicity
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Black or African American, Counseling, Female, Hispanic or Latino, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Male, Motivation, New England, Nicotine, Smoking, Program Evaluation, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review