The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: Pseudomonas putida WCS358 is a plant growth‐promoting rhizobacterium originally isolated from the rhizosphere of potato. It can suppress soil‐borne plant diseases by siderophore‐mediated competition for iron, but it has also been reported to result in induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis thaliana . Bacterial determinants of this strain involved in inducing systemic resistance in Arabidopsis were investigated using a Tn 5 transposon mutant defective in biosynthesis of the fluorescent siderophore pseudobactin, a non‐motile Tn 5 mutant lacking flagella, and a spontaneous phage‐resistant mutant lacking the O‐antigenic side chain of the lipopolysaccharides (LPS). When using Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato as the challenging pathogen, purified pseudobactin, flagella and LPS all triggered ISR. However, the mutants were all as effective as the parental strain, suggesting redundancy in ISR‐triggering traits in WCS358. The Botrytis cinerea –tomato, B. cinerea –bean and Colletotrichum lindemuthianum –bean model systems were used to test further the potential of P. putida WCS358 to induce ISR. Strain WCS358 significantly reduced disease development in all three systems, indicating that also on tomato and bean WCS358 can trigger ISR. In both tomato and bean, the LPS mutant had lost the ability to induce resistance, whereas the flagella mutant was still effective. In bean, the pseudobactin mutant was still effective, whereas this mutant has lost its effectivity in tomato. In both bean and tomato, flagella isolated from the parental strain were not effective, whereas LPS or pseudobactin did induce systemic resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin.
Eo, K., WARD, M. K., & De, R. (1954) · PubMed · Cited by 5,234
Raetz, C. R. H., & Whitfield, C. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.110601.135414 · Cited by 4,404
MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity
Asai, T., Tena, G., Plotnikova, J., Willmann, M. R., Chiu, W.-L., Gomez-Gomez, L., Boller, T., Ausubel, F. M., & Sheen, J. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415977a · Cited by 2,726
SYSTEMIC RESISTANCE INDUCED BY RHIZOSPHERE BACTERIA
van Loon, L. C., Bakker, P. A. H. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (1998) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.453 · Cited by 2,361
Self-citationGómez-Gómez, L., & Boller, T. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80265-8 · Cited by 2,280
Requirement of Salicylic Acid for the Induction of Systemic Acquired Resistance
Gaffney, T., Friedrich, L., Vernooij, B., Negrotto, D., Nye, G., Uknes, S., Ward, E., Kessmann, H., & Ryals, J. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.261.5122.754 · Cited by 1,853
Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin
Felix, G., Duran, J. D., Volko, S., & Boller, T. (1999) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00265.x · Cited by 1,715
Structures of Gram-Negative Cell Walls and Their Derived Membrane Vesicles
Beveridge, T. J. (1999) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.181.16.4725-4733.1999 · Cited by 1,528
Innate immunity in plants and animals: striking similarities and obvious differences
Nürnberger, T., Brunner, F., Kemmerling, B., & Piater, L. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0119.x · Cited by 1,286
A Novel Signaling Pathway Controlling Induced Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis
Pieterse, C. M. J., van Wees, S. C. M., van Pelt, J. A., Knoester, M., Laan, R., Gerrits, H., Weisbeek, P. J., & van Loon, L. C. (1998) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.10.9.1571 · Cited by 1,207
Self-citation
Cited by
Boller, T., & Felix, G. (2009) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346 · Cited by 3,387
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Self-citationOngena, M., Jourdan, E., Adam, A., Paquot, M., Brans, A., Joris, B., Arpigny, J., & Thonart, P. (2007) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x · Cited by 855
Oleńska, E., Małek, W., Wójcik, M., Swiecicka, I., Thijs, S., & Vangronsveld, J. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140682 · Cited by 555
Jasmonate signaling in plant interactions with resistance-inducing beneficial microbes
Van der Ent, S., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Pieterse, C. M. J. (2009) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.06.009 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- MEZIANE, H., VAN DER SLUIS, I., VAN LOON, L. C., HÖFTE, M., & BAKKER, P. A. H. M.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 177-185
- ISSN
- 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-6722
- OpenAlex
- W2106666964
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 13.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00276.x
- The paper
- MEZIANE, H., VAN DER SLUIS, I., VAN LOON, L. C., HÖFTE, M., & BAKKER, P. A. H. M. (2005). Determinants of Pseudomonas putida WCS358 involved in inducing systemic resistance in plants. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2005.00276.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
