The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to brassica crops
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Background: X anthomonas campestris pv. campestris ( Xcc ) ( P ammel) D owson is a G ram‐negative bacterium that causes black rot, the most important disease of vegetable brassica crops worldwide. Intensive molecular investigation of Xcc is gaining momentum and several whole genome sequences are available. Taxonomy: B acteria; Phylum P roteobacteria; Class G ammaproteobacteria; Order X anthomonadales; Family X anthomonadacea; Genus X anthomonas ; Species X . campestris . Host range and symptoms: Xcc can cause disease in a large number of species of B rassicaceae (ex‐ C ruciferae), including economically important vegetable B rassica crops and a number of other cruciferous crops, ornamentals and weeds, including the model plant A rabidopsis thaliana . Black rot is a systemic vascular disease. Typical disease symptoms include V ‐shaped yellow lesions starting from the leaf margins and blackening of the veins. Race structure, pathogenesis and epidemiology: Collections of Xcc isolates have been differentiated into physiological races based on the response of several brassica species lines. Black rot is a seed‐borne disease. The disease is favoured by warm, humid conditions and can spread rapidly from rain dispersal and irrigation water. Disease control: The control of black rot is difficult and relies on the use of pathogen‐free planting material and the elimination of other potential inoculum sources (infected crop debris and cruciferous weeds). Major gene resistance is very rare in B . oleracea (brassica C genome). Resistance is more readily available in other species, including potentially useful sources of broad‐spectrum resistance in B . rapa and B . carinata ( A and BC genomes, respectively) and in the wild relative A . thaliana . Genome: The reference genomes of three isolates have been released. The genome consists of a single chromosome of approximately 5 100 000 bp, with a GC content of approximately 65% and an average predicted number of coding DNA sequences ( CDS ) of 4308. Important genes identified: Three different secretion systems have been identified and studied in Xcc . The gene clusters xps and xcs encode a type II secretion system and xps genes have been linked to pathogenicity. The role of the type IV secretion system in pathogenicity is still uncertain. The hrp gene cluster encodes a type III secretion system that is associated with pathogenicity. An inventory of candidate effector genes has been assembled based on homology with known effectors. A range of other genes have been associated with virulence and pathogenicity, including the rpf , gum and wxc genes involved in the regulation of the synthesis of extracellular degrading enzymes, xanthan gum and lipopolysaccharides. Useful website: http://www.xanthomonas.org/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Canonne, J., Marino, D., Jauneau, A., Pouzet, C., Brière, C., Roby, D., & Rivas, S. (2011) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.111.088815 · Cited by 138
RetractedCurrent Status of the Gene-For-Gene Concept
Flor, H. H. (1971) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.py.09.090171.001423 · Cited by 3,185
Comparison of the genomes of two Xanthomonas pathogens with differing host specificities
da Silva, A. C. R., Ferro, J. A., Reinach, F. C., Farah, C. S., Furlan, L. R., Quaggio, R. B., Monteiro-Vitorello, C. B., Sluys, M. A. V., Almeida, N. F., Alves, L. M. C., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417459a · Cited by 1,218
Xanthomonas AvrBs3 Family-Type III Effectors: Discovery and Function
Boch, J., & Bonas, U. (2010) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081936 · Cited by 978
Reclassification of Xanthomonas
VAUTERIN, L., HOSTE, B., KERSTERS, K., & SWINGS, J. (1995) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-45-3-472 · Cited by 956
Structure of the extracellular polysaccharide from xanthomonas campestris
Jansson, P.-E., Kenne, L., & Lindberg, B. (1975) · Carbohydrate Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6215(00)85885-1 · Cited by 813
Type IV pilus structure and bacterial pathogenicity
Craig, L., Pique, M. E., & Tainer, J. A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro885 · Cited by 766
GENE-FOR-GENE COMPLEMENTARITY IN PLANT-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS
Keen, N. T. (1990) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.24.120190.002311 · Cited by 729
Pathogenomics of Xanthomonas: understanding bacterium–plant interactions
Ryan, R. P., Vorhölter, F.-J., Potnis, N., Jones, J. B., Van Sluys, M.-A., Bogdanove, A. J., & Dow, J. M. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2558 · Cited by 590
Cited by
(BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H. (2015) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4138 · Cited by 73
Luneau, J. S., Baudin, M., Quiroz Monnens, T., Carrère, S., Bouchez, O., Jardinaud, M., Gris, C., François, J., Ray, J., Torralba, B., et al. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.18313 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Vicente, J. G., & Holub, E. B.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-18
- ISSN
- 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-6722
- OpenAlex
- W1730105450
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to brassica crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00833.x
- The paper
- Vicente, J. G., & Holub, E. B. (2013). Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to brassica crops. Molecular Plant Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00833.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.