Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrogen glucose breath test to detect small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a prevalence case–control study in irritable bowel syndrome

LUPASCU, A., GABRIELLI, M., LAURITANO, E. C., SCARPELLINI, E., SANTOLIQUIDO, A., CAMMAROTA, G., FLORE, R., TONDI, P., POLA, P., GASBARRINI, G., GASBARRINI, A.·2005·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Summary: Background: Studies assessing the prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in irritable bowel syndrome gave contrasting results. Differences in criteria to define irritable bowel syndrome patients and methods to assess small intestinal bacterial overgrowth may explain different results. Moreover, no data exist on small intestinal bacterial overgrowth prevalence in a significant population of healthy non‐irritable bowel syndrome subjects. Aim: To assess the prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth by glucose breath test in patients with irritable bowel syndrome symptoms with respect to a consistent control group. Methods: Consecutive patients with irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome II criteria were enrolled. The control population consisted of 102 sex‐ and age‐matched healthy subjects without irritable bowel syndrome symptoms. All subjects underwent glucose breath test. A peak of H 2 values >10 p.p.m above the basal value after 50 g of glucose ingestion was considered suggestive of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Results: A total of 65 irritable bowel syndrome patients and 102 healthy controls were enrolled. Positivity to glucose breath test was found in 31% of irritable bowel syndrome patients with respect to 4% in the control group, the difference between groups resulting statistically significant (OR: 2.65; 95% CI: 3.5–33.7, P < 0.00001). Conclusions: The present case–control study showed an epidemiological association between irritable bowel syndrome and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Placebo‐controlled small intestinal bacterial overgrowth‐eradication studies are necessary to clarify the real impact of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth on irritable bowel syndrome symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02690.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
LUPASCU, A., GABRIELLI, M., LAURITANO, E. C., SCARPELLINI, E., SANTOLIQUIDO, A., CAMMAROTA, G., FLORE, R., TONDI, P., POLA, P., GASBARRINI, G., & GASBARRINI, A.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11-02
Volume
22
Issue
11-12
Pages
1157-1160
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2016005958
Cited by
184
References
4
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrogen glucose breath test to detect small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a prevalence case–control study in irritable bowel syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02690.x
The paper
LUPASCU, A., GABRIELLI, M., LAURITANO, E. C., SCARPELLINI, E., SANTOLIQUIDO, A., CAMMAROTA, G., FLORE, R., TONDI, P., POLA, P., GASBARRINI, G., & GASBARRINI, A. (2005). Hydrogen glucose breath test to detect small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a prevalence case–control study in irritable bowel syndrome. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02690.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.