Cited by 351Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthMicroscopic Colitis

Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Open access
Ford, Alexander C., Spiegel, Brennan M.R., Talley, Nicholas J., Moayyedi, Paul·2009·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aims Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) has been proposed as an etiologic factor in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but evidence is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of SIBO in IBS.Methods MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched up to November 2008. Case series and case-control studies applying diagnostic tests for SIBO in unselected adults meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS were eligible. Prevalence of a positive test for SIBO was extracted and pooled for all studies, and compared between cases and controls using an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI).Results Twelve studies were identified containing 1921 subjects meeting criteria for IBS. Pooled prevalence of a positive lactulose or glucose hydrogen breath test was 54% (95% CI, 32%-76%) and 31% (95% CI, 14%-50%), respectively, with statistically significant heterogeneity between study results. Prevalence of a positive jejunal aspirate and culture was 4% (95% CI, 2%-9%). The pooled odds ratio for any positive test for SIBO in cases compared with healthy asymptomatic controls was 3.45 (95% CI, 0.9-12.7) or 4.7 (95% CI, 1.7-12.95), depending on the criteria used to define a positive test, with statistically significant heterogeneity for both.Conclusions Prevalence of SIBO in individuals meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS was highest with breath testing. The prevalence in cases with IBS compared with controls varied according to criteria used to define a positive test. The role of testing for SIBO in individuals with suspected IBS remains unclear.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.06.031

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and altered intestinal microbiota are implicated in subgroups of functional bowel disorder patients.

    “Moreover, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO)25 and altered intestinal microbiota26 are implicated in subgroups of FBD patients.”
  • A meta-analysis review showed that small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) was present between 4% and up to 54% in IBS, suggesting that microbiota alterations may play a role in a subset of patients.

    “A metaanalysis review showed that small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) was present between 4% and up to 54% in IBS [55] , suggesting that microbiota alterations may play a role in a subset of patients.”
  • A meta-analysis of studies using hydrogen breath testing reported a pooled prevalence of SIBO in patients with IBS of 54-64%.

    “A meta-analysis of studies using HBT reported a pooled prevalence of SIBO in patients with IBS of 54–64% (61).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Drossman DA, Thompson WG, Talley NJ. Identification of sub- groups of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology Int 1990;3:159 -172.
  2. Madrid AM, Defilippi C, Defilippi C, et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with functional gastrointestinal diseases. Rev Med Chile 2007;135:1245-1252.
  3. Lasser RB, Bond JH, Levitt MD. Role of intestinal gas in func- tional abdominal pain. N Engl J Med 1975;293:524 -526.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, A. C., Spiegel, B. M. R., Talley, N. J., & Moayyedi, P.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Ford, Alexander C.
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
7
Issue
12
Pages
1279-1286
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087956925
Cited by
351
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 30
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American College of Gastroenterology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
Keywords
small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, irritable bowel syndrome, SIBO prevalence, lactulose breath test, glucose hydrogen breath test
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Humans, Intestine, Small, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review