The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence of high sugar intake, and low fibre and mineral intake, in the gluten‐free diet
Abstract
Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 32: 573–581 Summary: Background The only therapy for coeliac disease (CD) is a long‐term gluten‐free diet (GFD). Little is known about the detailed composition of such a diet. Aim To clarify the nutritional composition of a GFD and to compare it with a non‐GFD diet in representative non‐CD populations. Methods A total of 139 consecutive patients with CD were invited to fill in a prospective validated 5‐day food diary, of whom data from 93 were analysed. Results were compared with data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey of Adults and the UK Women’s Cohort Study (UKWCS). Results Individuals consuming a strict GFD generally had similar intakes of energy and nutrients to those of comparison populations, but a higher proportion of carbohydrate intake was obtained from nonmilk extrinsic sugars and intakes of nonstarch polysaccharides were low. Compared with the UKWCS sample, female patients adhering to a GFD had lower intakes of magnesium, iron, zinc, manganese, selenium and folate. In male patients, intakes of magnesium and selenium were particularly low. Conclusions This study reinforces the need for clinicians to recognize that avoidance of gluten cannot be the sole focus of a gluten‐free diet. Maintenance of adequate intakes of essential nutrients and in particular complex carbohydrates must also be the goal for patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health.
Livingstone, M. B., Prentice, A. M., Strain, J. J., Coward, W. A., Black, A. E., Barker, M. E., McKenna, P. G., & Whitehead, R. G. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6726.708 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Gluten free diet and nutrient deficiencies: A review
Vici, G., Belli, L., Biondi, M., & Polzonetti, V. (2016) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2016.05.002 · Cited by 522
Effect of water content and flour particle size on gluten-free bread quality and digestibility
de la Hera, E., Rosell, C. M., & Gomez, M. (2014) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.115 · Cited by 216
Assessment of Nutritional Adequacy of Packaged Gluten-free Food Products
Kulai, T., & Rashid, M. (2014) · Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research · doi:10.3148/cjdpr-2014-022 · Cited by 120
Babio, N., Alcázar, M., Castillejo, G., Recasens, M., Martínez‐Cerezo, F., Gutiérrez‐Pensado, V., Masip, G., Vaqué, C., Vila‐Martí, A., Torres‐Moreno, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001251 · Cited by 92
Serum Vitamins and Minerals at Diagnosis and Follow‐up in Children With Celiac Disease
Deora, V., Aylward, N., Sokoro, A., & El‐Matary, W. (2017) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000001475 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Wild, D., Robins, G. G., Burley, V. J., & Howdle, P. D.
- Venue
- Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-14
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 573-581
- ISSN
- 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2036
- OpenAlex
- W1507994391
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.