Cited by 455Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutrition and Health Studies

Accuracy of weighed dietary records in studies of diet and health.

Open access
Livingstone, M B, Prentice, A M, Strain, J J, Coward, W A, Black, A E, Barker, M E, McKenna, P G, Whitehead, R G·1990·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To provide an independent evaluation of seven day weighed dietary records, which are currently accepted as the most accurate technique for assessing habitual dietary intake in studies investigating the links between diet and health. DESIGN--Subjects who had previously participated in the Northern Ireland diet and health study were reselected by stratified random sampling to represent the range of energy intakes in the study as assessed by the seven day weighed dietary record. SETTING--Northern Ireland. SUBJECTS--31 Free living adults (16 men and 15 women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Energy intake as measured by the seven day weighed dietary record and total energy expenditure estimated concurrently by the doubly labelled water technique. RESULTS--Average recorded energy intakes were significantly lower than measured expenditure in the group overall (9.66 MJ/day v 12.15 MJ/day, 95% confidence interval 1.45 to 3.53 MJ/day). Among those in the upper third of energy intakes the mean (SE) ratio of intake to expenditure was close to 1.0, indicating accurate records (men 1.01 (0.11), women 0.96 (0.08]. In the middle and lower thirds the ratios for men were only 0.74 (0.05) and 0.70 (0.07) respectively and for women 0.89 (0.07) and 0.61 (0.07). CONCLUSIONS--These results show a serious bias in reporting habitual energy intake. If substantiated they may have wide implications for the interpretation of many nutritional studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.708

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. I Bingham SA. [Ihe dietary assessment of individuals; methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations. Nutnrtion Abstracts and Review 1987;57: 705-42.
  2. Metropolitan l1ife Insurance Company, New York. Metropolitan height and weight tables. Statistical Bulletin of the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 1983;64:2-9.
  3. Schoeller DA. Measttrcment of energy cxpenditure in free-living humans using doubly labelled water.] Nutr 1958;118: 1278-89.
  4. Coward WA. The doubly-labelled-water (2H2`0) mcthod: pritlciples and practice. Proc Nutr Soc 1988;47:209-18.
  5. Prentice AM. Applications of the 'H,(O techiique in free-lising adults. I'roc NutrSoc 1988;47:259-68.
  6. Coward WA, Prentice AM. Isotopc method for the measurement of carbon dioxide prodsiction in man. AmJ Clin Nutr 1985;41:659-61.
  7. Livingstone MBE, Prentice AM, Coward WA, et al. Simultaneous measure- ment of free-liising energy expenditure by the doubly-labelled water (2H2 O) method and heart-rate monitoring. Am] Clin Nutr (in press).
  8. Wilson P. Impros ing the methodology of drinking surveys. Statistict-an 1981;30:19 -67.
  9. Lissner L., Habicht J-l, Strapp BJ, Levitsky D)A, Haas JD, Roe DA. Body composition and cncrgy intakc: do overweight women overeat and under- report? Am 7 (,lixn Nutr 1989;49:320-5.
  10. Wornold 1, Carlgrcn (, Krotkiewski Ml. Energy expenditure and body composition during wcight reduction in hvperplasic obese womcn. Am ] (Clin N'utr 1978;31:750-63. (Accepted 3januarv 1990;

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingstone, M. B., Prentice, A. M., Strain, J. J., Coward, W. A., Black, A. E., Barker, M. E., McKenna, P. G., & Whitehead, R. G.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1990-03-17
Volume
300
Issue
6726
Pages
708-712
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2051679847
Cited by
455
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
28.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
weighed dietary records, dietary assessment, energy intake, energy expenditure, doubly labeled water, measurement error, energy intake underreporting, habitual diet
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Energy Intake, Diet, Diet Surveys, Energy Metabolism, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Health, Humans, Male, Medical Records, Middle Aged, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review