The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outcome following admission to UK intensive care units after cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database*
Abstract
Summary: Using a retrospective analysis of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Case Mix Programme Database (ICNARC CMPD), we have summarised the characteristics and outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients admitted to UK intensive care units (ICUs) after cardiac arrest. Descriptive statistics on case mix, physiology, treatment, service delivery, outcome and activity were described separately for community cardiac arrest, in‐hospital cardiac arrest (peri‐operative) and in‐hospital cardiac arrest (not peri‐operative). The impact on outcome of several patient characteristics and physiological values were analysed using multivariable logistic regression. Mechanically ventilated survivors of cardiac arrest accounted for 24 132 (5.8%) of all admissions to the 174 ICUs in the ICNARC CMP. Of these, 10 347 (42.9%) survived to leave the ICU and 6778 (28.6%) survived to acute hospital discharge. The ICNARC model gives much better discrimination than APACHE II for predicting hospital mortality after admission to ICU following cardiac arrest: the predicted hospital mortality based on the APACHE II and ICNARC model was 41.9% and 79.7%, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU
Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Hermans, G., Meersseman, W., Wouters, P. J., Milants, I., Van Wijngaerden, E., Bobbaers, H., & Bouillon, R. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052521 · Cited by 3,639
Hodgetts, T. J., Kenward, G., Vlachonikolis, I. G., Payne, S., & Castle, N. (2002) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00100-4 · Cited by 355
Cited by
Patient length of stay and mortality prediction: A survey
Awad, A., Bader–El–Den, M., & McNicholas, J. (2017) · Health Services Management Research · doi:10.1177/0951484817696212 · Cited by 128
Nolan, J. P., Ferrando, P., Soar, J., Benger, J., Thomas, M., Harrison, D. A., & Perkins, G. D. (2016) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1390-6 · Cited by 91
Self-citationGates, S., Lall, R., Quinn, T., Deakin, C. D., Cooke, M. W., Horton, J., Lamb, S. E., Slowther, A.-M., Woollard, M., Carson, A., et al. (2017) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta21110 · Cited by 62
National Cardiac Arrest Audit (NCAA)
Nolan, J., Gallagher, E., Lloyd-Scott, L., & Rowan, K. (2009) · Journal of the Intensive Care Society · doi:10.1177/175114370901000424 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nolan, J. P., Laver, S. R., Welch, C. A., Harrison, D. A., Gupta, V., & Rowan, K.
- Venue
- Anaesthesia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-05
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1207-1216
- ISSN
- 0003-2409 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2044
- OpenAlex
- W1523273863
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
