Cited by 19Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic diversity and population structureForensic and Genetic Research

Diversity and phylogeny of mitochondrial DNA isolated from mithun Bos frontalis located in Bhutan

Dorji, T., Mannen, H., Namikawa, T., Inamura, T., Kawamoto, Y.·2010·Animal Genetics

Abstract

We sequenced the 16S rRNA gene in mitochondrial DNA to characterize mithun located in Bhutan and to increase our understanding of its origin. We compared mithun with yak, European cattle, Bhutanese zebu and Indian zebu. Sequencing revealed low nucleotide diversity within the mithun population and their phylogenetic proximity to gaur. A close relationship between Bhutanese mithun and gaur was confirmed by an additional comparison with wild gaur specimens from three locations in Bhutan. Direct domestication of mithun from gaur was supported, while maternal contribution from the cattle lineage during domestication was not supported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02033.x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of recent genetic studies have found evidence that B. frontalis is a domestic version of B. gaurus.

    “Multiple studies in the last decade have genetically investigated whether B. frontalis is a domestic version of B. gaurus, and the majority of these studies have found evidence that this is indeed the case.”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Dorji et al. 2010

  • Bos frontalis is the domestic form of Bos gaurus.

    “The mithun/gayal/mithan Bos frontalis, the domestic form of Bos gaurus, is found in northeastern India, Bhutan, Myanmar, and China.”

    From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Dorji et al. 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorji, T., Mannen, H., Namikawa, T., Inamura, T., & Kawamoto, Y.
Affiliations
  • Royal Government of Bhutan (BT)
  • Kobe University (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
  • Aichi Prefectural University (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawamoto, Y.
Venue
Animal Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-07
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
554-556
ISSN
  • 0268-9146 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2052
OpenAlex
W1683193770
Cited by
19
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Institute for Humanity and Nature
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
Keywords
mithun, Bos frontalis, mitochondrial DNA, 16S rRNA gene, phylogeny, genetic diversity, gaur, Bos gaurus, domestication, Bos indicus, yak, maternal lineage, Bhutan
MeSH terms
Animals, Bhutan, Cattle, DNA, Mitochondrial, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Genetic Variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review