The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of different microbial probiotics in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings: effects on growth, nutrient digestibility and retention, digestive enzyme activities and intestinal microflora: Use of probiotics in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita
Open accessAbstract
Six iso-nitrogenous (350 g protein kg−1) and iso-caloric (4100 kcal kg−1) diets with or without probiotics supplementation namely T1 (Basal feed (BF) without probiotics; control), T2 (BF + Bacillus subtilis and Lactococcus lactis), T3 (BF + L. lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae), T4 (BF + B. subtilis and S. cerevisiae), T5 (BF + B. subtilis, L. lactis and S. cerevisiae) and T6 (BF + heat-killed bacteria of B. subtilis, L. lactis and S. cerevisiae) were fed to Labeo rohita fingerlings (6.0 ± 0.06 g) for 60 days in triplicate tanks (30 fish per tank). In all probiotic-supplemented diets, the probiotic concentration was maintained at 1011 cfu kg−1 feed. After 60 days of culture, the fish fed combination of three probiotics at equal proportion (T5) had higher (P < 0.05) growth, protein efficiency ratio, nutrient retention and digestibility and lower (P > 0.05) feed conversion ratio over other treatment groups. Total heterotrophic bacterial population in intestine was drastically reduced on 15th and 30th days of sampling than the initial value (0 day of sampling) for T3, T4 and T5 groups. Except T6, the gut colonization of respective probiotics, which were supplemented through the diets, was also increased up to 30 days of culture of fish and thereafter remained constant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Probiotics in marine larviculture
Vine, N. G., Leukes, W. D., & Kaiser, H. (2006) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00017.x · Cited by 436
Cited by
A review on the application of Bacillus as probiotics in aquaculture
Kuebutornye, F. K. A., Abarike, E. D., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2019.02.010 · Cited by 555
Recent advances in the role of probiotics and prebiotics in carp aquaculture: A review
Dawood, M. A. O., & Koshio, S. (2016) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.12.033 · Cited by 527
Probiotic application for sustainable aquaculture
Dawood, M. A. O., Koshio, S., Abdel‐Daim, M. M., & Van Doan, H. (2019) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12272 · Cited by 414
Host-Associated Probiotics: A Key Factor in Sustainable Aquaculture
Van Doan, H., Hoseinifar, S. H., Ringø, E., Ángeles Esteban, M., Dadar, M., Dawood, M. A. O., & Faggio, C. (2020) · Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture · doi:10.1080/23308249.2019.1643288 · Cited by 348
Rohani, M. F., Islam, S. M., Hossain, M. K., Ferdous, Z., Siddik, M. A., Nuruzzaman, M., Padeniya, U., Brown, C., & Shahjahan, M. (2022) · Fish & Shellfish Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.037 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- MOHAPATRA, S., CHAKRABORTY, T., PRUSTY, A. K., DAS, P., PANIPRASAD, K., & MOHANTA, K. N.
- Venue
- Aquaculture Nutrition
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011-04-27
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1353-5773 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1894046116
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of different microbial probiotics in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings: effects on growth, nutrient digestibility and retention, digestive enzyme activities and intestinal microflora: Use of probiotics in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00866.x
- The paper
- MOHAPATRA, S., CHAKRABORTY, T., PRUSTY, A. K., DAS, P., PANIPRASAD, K., & MOHANTA, K. N. (2012). Use of different microbial probiotics in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings: effects on growth, nutrient digestibility and retention, digestive enzyme activities and intestinal microflora: Use of probiotics in the diet of rohu, Labeo rohita. Aquaculture Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2011.00866.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.