Cited by 103Sleep and Work-Related FatigueTraffic and Road SafetyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A comparative study of acute and subchronic effects of dothiepin, fluoxetine and placebo on psychomotor and actual driving performance.

Open access
Ramaekers, JG, Muntjewerff, ND, O'Hanlon, JF·1995·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

1. The acute and subchronic effects of dothiepin 75‐150 mg and fluoxetine 20 mg on critical fusion frequency (CFF), sustained attention and actual driving performance were compared with those of placebo in a double‐blind, cross‐over study involving 18 healthy volunteers. Drugs and placebo were administered for 22 days in evening doses. Fluoxetine doses were constant but dothiepin doses increased on the evening of day 8. Performance was assessed on days 1, 8 and 22 of each treatment series. Subjective sleep parameters and possible side effects were recorded on visual analogue scales on alternate treatment days. 2. Dothiepin reduced sustained attention on day 1 by 6.7% (95% confidence interval (C1): ‐12.0 to ‐1.3%) and CFF on day 22 by 1.1 (CI: ‐2.2 to ‐0.1) Hz. Fluoxetine reduced sustained attention days 1, 8 and 22 of treatment by 7.4, 6.7 and 6.5% respectively (CI: ‐11.3 to ‐3.6; ‐ 14.3 to ‐1.5 and ‐9.5 to ‐3.4). CFF decreased linearly over days during fluoxetine treatment and significantly differed from placebo on day 22 with 1.2 Hz (CI: ‐2.3 to ‐0.2). Neither drug significantly affected driving performance. Whilst receiving dothiepin, subjects complained of drowsiness on days 1‐3 of treatment (mean rank 5.6; CI: 2.0 to 9.2) and slept 43 min longer (CI: 8.2 to 76.2).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04468.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dothiepin (75-150mg) was associated with increased trouble in waking, but longer total sleep time than placebo, in healthy participants.

    “(Ramaekers et al., 1995) found that dothiepin (75-150mg) was associated with increased trouble in waking, but longer total sleep time than placebo.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Ramaekers et al., 1995

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Seppällä T, 1975, Effects of tricyclic antidepressants and alcohol on psychomotor skills related to driving, Clin Pharmac Ther, 17, 515, 10.1002/cpt1975175515 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF00637594 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00002826-199417001-00003 · DOI
  4. Allen DA, 1993, Effects of lofepramine and dothiepin on memory and psychomotor function in healthy volunteers, Psychopharmac, 7, 33, 10.1177/0269881193007001061 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/hup.470020307 · DOI
  6. Schaffler K., 1989, Study on performance and alcohol interaction with the antidepressant fluoxetine, Int clin Psychopharmac, 4, 15
  7. 10.1016/0278-5846(88)90023-1 · DOI
  8. Stille G, 1989, Verkehrssicherheit unter dosulepin‐behandlung, Fortschritte der Medizin: Psychiatrie, 2, 75
  9. 10.1016/0278-5846(88)90062-0 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/hup.470080108 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/hup.470060408 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0924-977X(91)90689-R · DOI
  13. Mackworth NH., 1961, Selected papers on human factors in the design and use of control systems, 174
  14. 10.1126/science.7089544 · DOI
  15. Brookhuis KA, 1986, Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety‐T86, 223
  16. 10.1017/S0033291700014379 · DOI
  17. Norusis MJ., 1986, SPSS/PC + Advanced Statistics
  18. 10.1097/00004714-199106000-00004 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/00004714-199210000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1007/BF00609258 · DOI
  21. Davson H., 1976, The eye. Visual function in man
  22. Millson DS, 1988, Effects of a 5‐HT2 antagonist (ICI 169 369) on human pupillary response, Br J clin Pharmac, 26, 625P
  23. 10.1097/00004850-199207020-00002 · DOI
  24. Moro F, 1981, Serotonin nerve endings and regulation of pupillary diameters, Annals of Opthalmology, 13, 487
  25. 10.1177/026988118900300305 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ramaekers, J., Muntjewerff, N., & O'Hanlon, J.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-04
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
397-404
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W2105869026
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
dothiepin, fluoxetine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, driving performance, psychomotor performance, critical flicker frequency, sustained attention, sleep duration, sleepiness, adverse drug reactions
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Automobile Driving, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Dothiepin, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Multivariate Analysis, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review