Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 304

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta‐analysis of large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes

Open access
Cheung, Bernard M. Y., Lauder, Ian J., Lau, Chu‐Pak, Kumana, Cyrus R.·2004·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Aims: Since 2002, there have been five major outcome trials of statins reporting findings from more than 47 000 subjects. As individual trial results differed, we performed a meta‐analysis to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of statins overall and in subgroups. The aim of the study was to estimate the effect of statins on major coronary events and strokes, all‐cause mortality and noncardiovascular mortality, and in different subgroups. Methods: PubMed was searched for trials published in English. Randomized placebo‐controlled statin trials with an average follow up of at least 3 years and at least 100 major coronary events were included. For each trial, the statin used, number and type of subjects, proportion of women, mean age and follow up, baseline and change in lipid profile, cardiovascular and non‐cardiovascular outcomes were recorded. Results: Ten trials involving 79 494 subjects were included in the meta‐analysis. Due to heterogeneity, ALLHAT‐LLT was excluded from some analyses. Statin therapy reduced major coronary events by 27% (95%CI 23, 30%), stroke by 18% (95%CI 10, 25%) and all‐cause mortality by 15% (95%CI 8, 21%). There was a 4% (95%CI −10, 3%) nonsignificant reduction in noncardiovascular mortality. The reduction in major coronary events is independent of gender and presence of hypertension or diabetes. The risk reduction was greater in smokers (P < 0.05). Coronary events were reduced by 23% (95%CI 18, 29%) in pravastatin trials and 29% (95%CI 25, 33%) in five trials using other statins. Pravastatin reduced strokes by 12% (95%CI 1, 21%) whilst other statins reduced strokes by 24% (95%CI 16, 32%) (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Statins reduce coronary events, strokes and all‐cause mortality without increasing noncoronary mortality. The benefits accrue in men and women, hypertensives and normotensives, diabetics and nondiabetics, and particularly in smokers. Pravastatin appears to have less impact on strokes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02060.x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group., 1994, Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), Lancet, 344, 1383
  2. 10.1001/jama.282.24.2340 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1001/jama.287.24.3215 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1001/jama.288.23.2998 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12948-0 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1001/jama.282.20.1899 · DOI
  7. Fleiss JL, 1994, The Handbook of Research Synthesis, 245
  8. 10.1161/01.CIR.91.10.2528 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1056/NEJM199701163360301 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1053/euhj.1998.1150 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1185/030079902125000787 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1053/euhj.2002.3291 · DOI
  13. Wysowski DK, 1990, Deaths due to accidents and violence in two recent trials of cholesterol‐lowering drugs, Arch Intern Med, 150, 2169, 10.1001/archinte.1990.00390210125027 · doi:10.1001/archinte.1990.00390210125027
  14. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530250059028 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92836-7 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)00904-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71806-7 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)71806-7
  18. 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.689 · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7391.689
  19. 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.51 · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.51
  20. 10.1001/jama.288.1.49 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1056/NEJM200004063421408 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1001/jama.285.19.2486 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1161/01.HYP.25.3.305 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90861-B · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00159-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Cheung BMY, 2001, Should decisions on treatment be based on absolute benefit rather than absolute risk?, NZ Med J, 114, 214

Cited by

See all 304

Metadata

Authors
Cheung, B. M. Y., Lauder, I. J., Lau, C., & Kumana, C. R.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03-23
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
640-651
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W2032568924
Cited by
304
References
10
FWCI
26.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta‐analysis of large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02060.x
The paper
Cheung, B. M. Y., Lauder, I. J., Lau, C., & Kumana, C. R. (2004). Meta‐analysis of large randomized controlled trials to evaluate the impact of statins on cardiovascular outcomes. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02060.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.