Cited by 388Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Effect of Pravastatin on Coronary Disease Events in Subgroups Defined by Coronary Risk Factors: The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project

Open access
Sacks, Frank M., Tonkin, Andrew M., Shepherd, James, Braunwald, Eugene, Cobbe, Stuart, Hawkins, C. Morton, Keech, Anthony, Packard, Christopher +3 more·2000·Circulation

Abstract

Background —Previous trials have had insufficient numbers of coronary events to address definitively the effect of lipid-modifying therapy on coronary heart disease in subgroups of patients with varying baseline characteristics. Methods and Results —The data from 3 large randomized trials with pravastatin 40 mg were pooled and analyzed with the use of a prospectively defined protocol. Included were 19 768 patients, 102 559 person-years of follow-up, 2194 primary end points (coronary death or nonfatal myocardial infarction), and 3717 expanded end points (primary end point, CABG, or PTCA). Pravastatin significantly reduced relative risk in younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients, men and women, smokers and nonsmokers, and patients with or without diabetes or hypertension. The relative effect was smaller, but absolute risk reduction was similar in patients with hypertension compared with those without hypertension. Relative risk reduction was significant in predefined categories of baseline lipid concentrations. Tests for interaction were not significant between relative risk reduction and baseline total cholesterol (5% to 95% range 177 to 297 mg/dL, 4.6 to 7.7 mmol/L), HDL cholesterol (27 to 58 mg/dL, 0.7 to 1.5 mmol/L), and triglyceride (74 to 302 mg/dL, 0.8 to 3.4 mmol/L) concentrations, analyzed as continuous variables. However, for LDL cholesterol, the probability values for interaction were 0.068 for the prespecified primary end point and 0.019 for the expanded end point. Relative risk reduction was similar throughout most of the baseline LDL cholesterol range (125 to 212 mg/dL, 3.2 to 5.5 mmol/L) with the possible exception of the lowest quintile of CARE/LIPID (<125 mg/dL) (relative risk reduction 5%, 95% CI 19% to −12%). Conclusions —Pravastatin treatment is effective in reducing coronary heart disease events in patients with high or low risk factor status and across a wide range of pretreatment lipid concentrations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.102.16.1893

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. The PPP Project Investigators. Design, rationale, and baseline character- istics of the Prospective Pravastatin Pooling (PPP) Project. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:899 -905.
  2. Miettinen TA, Pyorala K, Olsson AG, et al. Cholesterol-lowering therapy in women and elderly patients with myocardial infarction or angina pectoris. Circulation. 1997;96:4211-4218.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sacks, F. M., Tonkin, A. M., Shepherd, J., Braunwald, E., Cobbe, S., Hawkins, C. M., Keech, A., Packard, C., Simes, J., Byington, R., & Furberg, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From the Brigham and Women’s Hospital (F.M.S., E.B.), Harvard Medical School (F.M.S., E.B.), and Harvard School of Public Health (F.M.S.), Boston, Mass; National Heart Foundation (A.M.T.), Melbourne, Australia; University of Glasgow (J.S., S.C., C.P.), Glasgow, Scotland; University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston (C.M.H.); University of Sydney (A.K., J.S.), Sydney, Australia; and Wake Forest University (R.B., C.D.F.), Winston Salem, NC.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2000-10-17
Volume
102
Issue
16
Pages
1893-1900
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2072734670
Cited by
388
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
39.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Wake Forest University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
pravastatin, coronary artery disease, lipid therapy, subgroup analysis, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, age and sex differences, myocardial infarction, coronary death, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting, pooled analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cholesterol, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Treatment Outcome, Pravastatin, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review