The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinically relevant drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs
Open accessAbstract
Some patients with difficult‐to‐treat epilepsy benefit from combination therapy with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Additionally, virtually all epilepsy patients will receive, at some time in their lives, other medications for the management of associated conditions. In these situations, clinically important drug interactions may occur. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone induce many cytochrome P450 (CYP) and glucuronyl transferase (GT) enzymes, and can reduce drastically the serum concentration of associated drugs which are substrates of the same enzymes. Examples of agents whose serum levels are decreased markedly by enzyme‐inducing AEDs, include lamotrigine, tiagabine, several steroidal drugs, cyclosporin A, oral anticoagulants and many cardiovascular, antineoplastic and psychotropic drugs. Valproic acid is not enzyme inducer, but it may cause clinically relevant drug interactions by inhibiting the metabolism of selected substrates, most notably phenobarbital and lamotrigine. Compared with older generation agents, most of the recently developed AEDs are less likely to induce or inhibit the activity of CYP or GT enzymes. However, they may be a target for metabolically mediated drug interactions, and oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, felbamate and, at high dosages, topiramate may stimulate the metabolism of oral contraceptive steroids. Levetiracetam, gabapentin and pregabalin have not been reported to cause or be a target for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions involving AEDs have not been well characterized, but their understanding is important for a more rational approach to combination therapy. In particular, neurotoxic effects appear to be more likely with coprescription of AEDs sharing the same primary mechanism of action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lamotrigine plasma levels reduced by oral contraceptives
Sabers, A., Buchholt, J. M., Uldall, P., & Hansen, E. L. (2001) · Epilepsy Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-1211(01)00305-9 · Cited by 219
Cited by
Glioblastoma and Other Malignant Gliomas: A Clinical Review
Omuro, A. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280319 · Cited by 2,301
Consensus Guidelines for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Neuropsychopharmacology: Update 2017
Hiemke, C., Bergemann, N., Clement, H., Conca, A., Deckert, J., Domschke, K., Eckermann, G., Egberts, K., Gerlach, M., Greiner, C., et al. (2018) · Pharmacopsychiatry · doi:10.1055/s-0043-116492 · Cited by 1,446
Antiepileptic drug interactions—Principles and clinical implications
I. Johannessen, S., & Johannessen Landmark, C. (2010) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/157015910792246254 · Cited by 343
McCance‐Katz, E. F., Sullivan, L. E., & Nallani, S. (2010) · The American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2009.00005.x · Cited by 318
An Overview of the Evidence and Mechanisms of Herb–Drug Interactions
Fasinu, P. S., Bouic, P. J., & Rosenkranz, B. (2012) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2012.00069 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Perucca, E.
- Venue
- British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10-27
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 246-255
- ISSN
- 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2125
- OpenAlex
- W2069987842
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinically relevant drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02529.x
- The paper
- Perucca, E. (2006). Clinically relevant drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02529.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.