Cited by 139Treatment of Major DepressionPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical studies and practices

Simultaneous population pharmacokinetic modelling of ketamine and three major metabolites in patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression

Open access
Zhao, Xiaochen, Venkata, Swarajya Lakshmi Vattem, Moaddel, Ruin, Luckenbaugh, Dave A., Brutsche, Nancy E., Ibrahim, Lobna, Zarate Jr, Carlos A., Mager, Donald E. +1 more·2012·British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • (R,S)‐ketamine is a phencyclidine derivative that was initially developed as an anaesthetic agent and which is currently being studied in the treatment of pain and depression. After administration, the drug is extensively N‐demethylated to (R,S)‐norketamine. The pharmacokinetics of ketamine and norketamine have been extensively studied in volunteers and patients after the administration of anaesthetic and sub‐anaesthetic doses. However, ketamine and norketamine are extensively transformed into a series of diastereomeric hydroxyketamines and hydroxynorketamines and (R,S)‐dehydronorketamine metabolites. The plasma kinetics of these metabolites have not been elucidated. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • The current study expands the characterization of the disposition kinetics of (R,S)‐ketamine and (R,S)‐norketamine and presents a population pharmacokinetic analysis of (R)‐ketamine, (S)‐ketamine, (R)‐norketamine, (S)‐norketamine, (R)‐dehydronorketamine, (S)‐ dehydronorketamine and (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐hydroxynorketamine and the serum concentration–time profiles of multiple ketamine metabolites observed in the plasma of patients after a single 40 min infusion of a sub‐anaesthetic dose of the drug. The data demonstrate that while norketamine is an initial metabolite, it is not the major circulating metabolite and suggest that the determination of the downstream metabolites of ketamine may play a role in the pharmacological effects of the drug. AIM To construct a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model for ketamine (Ket), norketamine (norKet), dehydronorketamine (DHNK), hydroxynorketamine (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐HNK) and hydroxyketamine (HK) in patients with treatment‐resistant bipolar depression. METHOD Plasma samples were collected at 40, 80, 110, 230 min on day 1, 2 and 3 in nine patients following a 40 min infusion of (R,S)‐Ket (0.5 mg kg−1) and analyzed for Ket, norKet and DHNK enantiomers and (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐HNK, (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐HK and (2S,6R;2R,6S)‐HK. A compartmental popPK model was constructed that included all quantified analytes, and unknown parameters were estimated with an iterative two‐stage algorithm in ADAPT5. RESULTS Ket, norKet, DHNK and (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐HNK were present during the first 230 min post infusion and significant concentrations (>5 ng ml−1) were observed on day 1. Plasma concentrations of (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐HK and (2S,6R;2R,6S)‐HK were below the limit of quantification. The average (S) : (R) plasma concentrations for Ket and DHNK were <1.0 while no significant enantioselectivity was observed for norKet. There were large inter‐patient variations in terminal half‐lives and relative metabolite concentrations; at 230 min (R,S)‐DHNK was the major metabolite in four out of nine patients, (R,S)‐norKet in three out of nine patients and (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐HNK in two out of nine patients. The final PK model included three compartments for (R,S)‐Ket, two compartments for (R,S)‐norKet and single compartments for DHNK and HNK. All PK profiles were well described, and parameters for (R,S)‐Ket and (R,S)‐norKet were in agreement with prior estimates. CONCLUSION This represents the first PK analysis of (2S,6S;2R,6R)‐HNK and (R,S)‐DHNK. The results demonstrate that while norKet is the initial metabolite, it is not the main metabolite suggesting that future Ket studies should include the analysis of the major metabolites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04198.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Norketamine, DHNK, and (2R,6R;2S,6S)-HNK appear in human plasma as early as 40 minutes after an antidepressant ketamine dose, with (2R,6R;2S,6S)-HNK and (2S,6R;2R,6S)-HNK being the most abundant HNKs.

    “Norketamine, DHNK, and (2R,6R;2S,6S)-HNK in particular are detected in human plasma as early as 40 minutes following an antidepressant dose of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg i.v. over 40 minutes) with the most abundant HNKs being (2R,6R;2S,6S)-HNK and (2S,6R;2R,6S)-HNK”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Zhao et al., 2012

    The Abstract (page not provided) reports plasma sampling beginning at 40 minutes after the start of a 0.5 mg/kg, 40-minute ketamine infusion and detects norketamine, DHNK, and (2S,6S;2R,6R)-HNK. The Discussion (page not provided) identifies the two named HNKs as predominant in earlier CRPS-patient data, not in this study’s bipolar-depression patients; among the other HNKs measured in this study, it names (2S,5R;2R,5S)-HNK as most predominant. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kohrs R, Durieux ME. Ketamine: teaching an old drug new tricks. Anesth Analg 1998; 87: 1186-93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, X., Venkata, S. L. V., Moaddel, R., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Brutsche, N. E., Ibrahim, L., Zarate Jr, C. A., Mager, D. E., & Wainer, I. W.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wainer, Irving W.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-10
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
304-314
ISSN
  • 0306-5251 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2125
OpenAlex
W2158336114
Cited by
137
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 57980, R01GM057980)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
ketamine, norketamine, dehydronorketamine, hydroxynorketamine, ketamine metabolites, population pharmacokinetic model, treatment-resistant bipolar depression, enantiomers, N-demethylation, plasma concentration-time curve, drug disposition kinetics
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Antidepressive Agents, Biotransformation, Bipolar Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Drug Resistance, Female, Humans, Hydroxylation, Infusions, Parenteral, Ketamine, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review