Cited by 124Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Managementmelanin and skin pigmentationCancer and Skin Lesions

An evaluation of the revised seven-point checklist for the early diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma

HEALSMITH, M.F., BOURKE, J.F., OSBORNE, J.E., GRAHAM-BROWN, R.A.C.·1994·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

The seven-point checklist has been widely advocated as a sensitive screening test for malignant melanoma. A number of groups have questioned the sensitivity of this system, especially in the detection of early lesions. We have assessed the sensitivity and specificity of the revised seven-point checklist when applied to lesions seen in our department over a 26-month period and compared it with the American ABCDE evaluation system. All melanomas (n = 65) were detected using the revised seven-point checklist and all were found to have at least one of the three major criteria defined by that system. Five (7.7%) melanomas were not picked up by the ABCDE checklist. Of 100 randomly selected patients who attended the clinic during the same period, with clinically diagnosed benign pigmented lesions, 63 had at least one major feature of the revised seven-point checklist. Forty (62%) of the melanomas, compared with only (4%) of the benign lesions, had more than one major feature. This study confirms the sensitivity of the revised seven-point checklist in the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb06881.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HEALSMITH, M. F., BOURKE, J. F., OSBORNE, J. E., & GRAHAM-BROWN, R. A. C.
Affiliations
Leicester Royal Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
BOURKE, J.F.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
1994-01
Volume
130
Issue
1
Pages
48-50
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2051379654
Cited by
124
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
Keywords
cutaneous melanoma, early diagnosis, skin cancer screening, diagnostic sensitivity, benign pigmented lesions, melanoma detection
MeSH terms
Dermatology, Diagnosis, Differential, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Melanoma, Nevus, Pigmented, Skin Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review