Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,051

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): initial validation and practical use

LEWIS-JONES, M.S., FINLAY, A.Y.·2010·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Skin disease can cause severe disability and handicap in children. Measurement of the impact of skin disease on the quality of life is required to aid clinical decision‐making, for clinical research, for audit of paediatric dermatology services, and for political reasons, to aid arguments for more resources for the care of children with skin disease. Adult measures are inappropriate, as the lives of children differ markedly from those of adults. The purpose of this study was to create and initially validate a simple practical questionnaire for use in children. One hundred and sixty‐nine children, aged 3–16 years, attending a paediatric dermatology clinic, wrote down, with the help of their parents, all the ways in which their skin disease affected their lives. One hundred and eleven different aspects were identified; 10 questions were composed to cover these aspects, using a structure similar to the Adult Dermatology Life Quality Index. This draft questionnaire was piloted on two series, totalling 40 children, and minor alterations were made to improve clarity. The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) questionnaire (maximum score 30) was then given to a further 233 dermatology paediatric out‐patients (CDLQI mean = 5.1, SD = 4.9), 47 normal controls (mean 0.4, 0.7) and 55 control patients attending a general paediatric clinic (mean 0.7, 2.5). The CDLQI scores for eczema (mean = 7.7, 5.6, n = 47), psoriasis (5.4, 5.0, n = 25) and acne (5.7, 4.4, n = 40), were all highly significantly greater than for moles and naevi (2.3, 2.9, n = 29). The highest mean score was that for scabies (mean = 9.5, 10.5, n = 6). Overall, the highest scoring questions (each maximum score 3) related to symptoms (mean = 1.05, n = 233), feelings (0.90), swimming and sports (0.51), sleep (0.49) and treatment effects (0.47), with the question on effects on friendships (0.18) scoring least. Forty‐six additional patients completed the CDLQI on two occasions, with a 4‐day interval to check reliability of test‐retesting. The standard deviation of the differences between pairs (2.5) was substantially less than the standard deviation of the measurements themselves (before = 4.79, after = 5.08). confirming acceptable repeatability. This study has confirmed the major impact of widespread inflammatory skin disease, in particular atopic eczema, on the quality of life of children. Although further validation is required, the CLDQI provides a new technique for comparative purposes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb16953.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 1,051

Metadata

Authors
LEWIS-JONES, M. S., & FINLAY, A. Y.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2010-09-06
Volume
132
Issue
6
Pages
942-949
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022137053
Cited by
1,051
References
11
FWCI
48.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): initial validation and practical use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb16953.x
The paper
LEWIS-JONES, M. S., & FINLAY, A. Y. (2010). The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI): initial validation and practical use. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb16953.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.