Cited by 32Hair Growth and DisordersSkin and Cellular Biology Researchdental development and anomalies

Ectopic expression of c-Myc in the skin affects the hair growth cycle and causes an enlargement of the sebaceous gland

Bull, J.J., Pelengaris, S., Hendrix, S., Chronnell, C.M.T., Khan, M., Philpott, M.P.·2005·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background The hair follicle continually undergoes dynamic remodelling in a cyclical manner involving tightly coordinated patterns of cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. The oncoprotein c-Myc is a key regulator of these events in epidermal keratinocytes, but its importance in the hair growth cycle has not previously been determined. Objectives To determine the role of c-Myc in the hair growth cycle. Methods We characterized the hair follicle phenotype of transgenic mice that permit expression of a switchable form of c-Myc (c-Myc-ER) in the suprabasal epithelial layers of the epidermis and hair follicle. Results c-Myc activation increased epithelial cell proliferation in the outer root sheath and distal hair follicle, without any substantial alteration in levels of apoptosis. Moreover, chronic c-Myc activation resulted in marked desynchronization of the murine hair growth cycle, uncoupling of hair cycle-related skin thickness and enlargement of the sebaceous gland. Conclusions These data implicate c-Myc in the control of hair growth cycling and hair cycle-related epidermal and sebaceous gland homeostasis. We suggest that c-Myc may be activating follicular stem cells either directly or indirectly and that this has important implications for control of the 'hair cycle clock', hair growth and epidermal maintenance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06458.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bull, J. J., Pelengaris, S., Hendrix, S., Chronnell, C. M. T., Khan, M., & Philpott, M. P.
Affiliations
Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Philpott, M.P.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2005-06
Volume
152
Issue
6
Pages
1125-1133
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W1971005855
Cited by
32
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › dental development and anomalies
Keywords
c-Myc, hair cycle, hair follicle, epidermal keratinocytes, epithelial cell proliferation, hair follicle stem cells, transgenic mice, oncoprotein, skin homeostasis
MeSH terms
Animals, Epidermis, Estrogen Antagonists, Hair, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Inbred CBA, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Scalp, Sebaceous Glands, Tamoxifen, Biomarkers, Gene Expression, Genes, myc, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc, Hair Follicle, Ki-67 Antigen, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Cell Proliferation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review