Sunscreens and melanoma: the future looks bright
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Meta-analyses of observational case-control studies have demonstrated no association between sunscreen use and the development of malignant melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To examine whether this observation is to be expected given the period during which the case-control studies were conducted, the sunscreens prevalent at that time, and how sunscreen is used and applied in practice. To predict whether modern sunscreens are likely to be effective as a preventative agent in melanoma. METHODS: The protection against solar ultraviolet radiation delivered by sunscreens available prior to the early 1990s (when the data used in most published case-control studies were collected) was estimated by combining their absorption properties with the amount applied in a way reflecting common usage. Similar estimates were made for the protection offered by modern sunscreens. RESULTS: It is not surprising that case-control studies have failed to find any association between sunscreen use and the risk of melanoma when consideration is given to the sunscreens in common usage at the time and the way in which sunscreen is applied in practice. Modern high Sun Protection Factor, broad-spectrum sunscreens, on the other hand, can be expected to be an effective measure in helping to prevent melanoma compared with sunscreens typical of those used 10-20 years ago. CONCLUSIONS: It is reasonable to suppose that the improvement in performance of modern sunscreens will lead to a worthwhile benefit as a preventative agent against melanoma, although these benefits may not be seen for several decades.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diffey et al. suggested that most sunscreens in the past offered no or little UVA protection.
“Diffey et al. summarized this well in suggesting that most sunscreens in the past offered no or little UVA protection (50).”
From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Ultraviolet B but not Ultraviolet A Radiation Initiates Melanoma
De Fabo, E. C., Noonan, F. P., Fears, T., & Merlino, G. (2004) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-04-1454 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Huncharek, M., & Kupelnick, B. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.7.1173 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies
Wang, S. Q., Balagula, Y., & Osterwalder, U. (2010) · Dermatologic Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2009.01289.x · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Does chronic sunscreen use reduce vitamin D production to insufficient levels?
Norval, M., & Wulf, H. C. (2009) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09332.x · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Birch-Machin, M. A., & Swalwell, H. (2010) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gep061 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Point: Sunscreen Use Is a Safe and Effective Approach to Skin Cancer Prevention
Green, A. C., & Williams, G. M. (2007) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-07-0477 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Quinolines derivatives as novel sunscreening agents
Polonini, H. C., Dias, R. M. P., Souza, I. O., Gonçalves, K. M., Gomes, T. B. B., Raposo, N. R. B., & da Silva, A. D. (2013) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.06.046 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Diffey, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Diffey, B.L.
- ORCID
- Diffey, B.L.
- Venue
- British Journal of Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 378-381
- ISSN
- 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2133
- OpenAlex
- W1965933423
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Keywords
- sunscreen use, melanoma, melanoma prevention, UV protection, sun protection factor, broad-spectrum sunscreen, case-control study limitations
- MeSH terms
- Absorption, Humans, Melanoma, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Skin Neoplasms, Sunscreening Agents, Ultraviolet Rays
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review