Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 348

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Variability in the clinical pattern of cutaneous side-effects of drugs with systemic symptoms: does a DRESS syndrome really exist?

Peyrière, H., Dereure, O., Breton, H., Demoly, P., Cociglio, M., Blayac, J-P., Hillaire-Buys, D., the Network of the French Pharmacovigilance Centers·2006·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve the definition of the various clinical patterns of patients with drug-induced cutaneous side-effects with systemic symptoms, and their possible relationships with the triggering medication, with the ultimate goal of helping in the identification of the causal drug in difficult situations when the patient is taking several drugs. METHODS: Cases of drug-induced cutaneous side-effects associated with various systemic syndromes related to anticonvulsants (carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbitone), minocycline, allopurinol, abacavir and nevirapine were collected retrospectively from the French Pharmacovigilance database (FPD) over a period of 15 years (1985-2000). The clinical patterns typical of the causative drugs were described and compared with data from the literature. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixteen patients with symptoms and signs consistent with cutaneous drug reactions with systemic symptoms were reported to the FPD during this period of time. Their pattern was similar to published data for these drugs, with fever, cutaneous eruption, hepatic abnormalities and eosinophilia being the most prominent but inconstant symptoms. There are clues suggesting that some particular lesional patterns may exist for some drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Although some trends emerge from these retrospective data, they suggest that no clear, unified outline can currently be defined for these multi-organ drug-induced reactions. Instead, a constellation of various symptoms and signs were recorded, that might be sorted in different patterns according to the causal drug, a finding that might indeed improve accurate identification of the causative drug in patients receiving several principal medications at a time. A national prospective study systematically collecting standardized data is required better to define the outlines of these severe adverse drug reactions and to evaluate prognostic data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07284.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 348

Metadata

Authors
Peyrière, H., Dereure, O., Breton, H., Demoly, P., Cociglio, M., Blayac, J.-P., Hillaire-Buys, D., & the Network of the French Pharmacovigilance Centers
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2006-04-24
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
422-428
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090153002
Cited by
348
References
1
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variability in the clinical pattern of cutaneous side-effects of drugs with systemic symptoms: does a DRESS syndrome really exist? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07284.x
The paper
Peyrière, H., Dereure, O., Breton, H., Demoly, P., Cociglio, M., Blayac, J.-P., Hillaire-Buys, D., & the Network of the French Pharmacovigilance Centers. (2006). Variability in the clinical pattern of cutaneous side-effects of drugs with systemic symptoms: does a DRESS syndrome really exist? British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07284.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.