Cited by 81Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesHealth and Well-being StudiesDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

Psychological factors in leg ulceration: a case-control study

Moffatt, C.J., Franks, P.J., Doherty, D.C., Smithdale, R., Steptoe, A.·2009·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of the role that psychological status plays in the development and outcomes of chronic disease, but little understanding of its importance in chronic leg ulceration. OBJECTIVES: To examine psychological health and perceived social support in patients with chronic leg ulceration. METHODS: Patients with leg ulceration within a defined population were matched for age and gender (1:1) with community controls in a matched case-control study. Analysis was by conditional logistic regression and matched t-test analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (60 women and 35 men; 59% aged over 75 years) were identified and matched to the same number of controls. Cases had significantly poorer health-related quality of life in all domains of the Nottingham Health Profile (all P < or = 0.001), compared with controls. Levels of depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were significantly greater in the patient group (mean 5.3 vs. 3.6, P < 0.001). Social support (Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey scale) showed significantly fewer social networks and less perceived social support in patients than controls (P = 0.008). Patients used significantly fewer coping strategies (COPE scale) than controls, particularly with regard to problem-focused coping strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with leg ulceration experience poor psychological health with a greater risk of depression, less perceived social support and greater social isolation. Systems of care should offer an environment that reduces social isolation and increases support to this patient group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09211.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moffatt, C. J., Franks, P. J., Doherty, D. C., Smithdale, R., & Steptoe, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Franks, P.J.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2009-10
Volume
161
Issue
4
Pages
750-756
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W2035685307
Cited by
81
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
mental health, depression, perceived social support, social isolation, coping strategies, problem-focused coping, health-related quality of life, chronic disease
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Chronic Disease, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Leg Ulcer, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Case-Control Studies, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review