Cited by 39Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMobile Health and mHealth Applicationsmelanin and skin pigmentation

Caution in melanoma risk analysis with smartphone application technology: Correspondence

Robson, Y., Blackford, S., Roberts, D.·2012·British Journal of Dermatology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11046.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robson, Y., Blackford, S., & Roberts, D.
Affiliations
Singleton Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Robson, Y.
  • Blackford, S.
  • Roberts, D.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2012-07-05
Volume
167
Issue
3
Pages
703-704
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128507689
Cited by
39
References
2
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
Keywords
melanoma, melanoma risk assessment, mobile application, mobile health, skin cancer screening, digital health tools
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Melanoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Skin Neoplasms, Software, Telemedicine, Risk Assessment, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review