Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 478

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosing and treating Diamond Blackfan anaemia: results of an international clinical consensus conference

Open access
Vlachos, Adrianna, Ball, Sarah, Dahl, Niklas, Alter, Blanche P., Sheth, Sujit, Ramenghi, Ugo, Meerpohl, Joerg, Karlsson, Stefan, Liu, Johnson M., Leblanc, Thierry, Paley, Carole, Kang, Elizabeth M., Leder, Eva Judmann, Atsidaftos, Eva, Shimamura, Akiko, Bessler, Monica, Glader, Bertil, Lipton, Jeffrey M., on behalf of the participants of the Sixth Annual Daniella Maria Arturi International Consensus Conference·2008·British Journal of Haematology

Abstract

Summary: Diamond Blackfan anaemia (DBA) is a rare, genetically and clinically heterogeneous, inherited red cell aplasia. Classical DBA affects about seven per million live births and presents during the first year of life. However, as mutated genes have been discovered in DBA, non‐classical cases with less distinct phenotypes are being described in adults as well as children. In caring for these patients it is often difficult to have a clear understanding of the treatment options and their outcomes because of the lack of complete information on the natural history of the disease. The purpose of this document is to review the criteria for diagnosis, evaluate the available treatment options, including corticosteroid and transfusion therapies and stem cell transplantation, and propose a plan for optimizing patient care. Congenital anomalies, mode of inheritance, cancer predisposition, and pregnancy in DBA are also reviewed. Evidence‐based conclusions will be made when possible; however, as in many rare diseases, the data are often anecdotal and the recommendations are based upon the best judgment of experienced clinicians. The recommendations regarding the diagnosis and management described in this report are the result of deliberations and discussions at an international consensus conference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07269.x

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 93 references

Cited by

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Vlachos, A., Ball, S., Dahl, N., Alter, B. P., Sheth, S., Ramenghi, U., Meerpohl, J., Karlsson, S., Liu, J. M., Leblanc, T., Paley, C., Kang, E. M., Leder, E. J., Atsidaftos, E., Shimamura, A., Bessler, M., Glader, B., Lipton, J. M., & Conference, O. B. O. T. P. O. T. S. A. D. M. A. I. C.
Venue
British Journal of Haematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-21
Volume
142
Issue
6
Pages
859-876
ISSN
  • 0007-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2141
OpenAlex
W2149046852
Cited by
478
References
93
FWCI
14.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosing and treating Diamond Blackfan anaemia: results of an international clinical consensus conference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07269.x
The paper
Vlachos, A., Ball, S., Dahl, N., Alter, B. P., Sheth, S., Ramenghi, U., Meerpohl, J., Karlsson, S., Liu, J. M., Leblanc, T., Paley, C., Kang, E. M., Leder, E. J., Atsidaftos, E., Shimamura, A., Bessler, M., Glader, B., Lipton, J. M., & Conference, O. B. O. T. P. O. T. S. A. D. M. A. I. C. (2008). Diagnosing and treating Diamond Blackfan anaemia: results of an international clinical consensus conference. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07269.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.