Emotional processing in children with conduct problems and callous/unemotional traits
Abstract
Background A considerable body of evidence now suggests that conduct problem (CP) children with callous/unemotional (CU) traits differ in many ways from CP children without these characteristics. Previous research has suggested that there are important differences for youth with CP and CU characteristics in their ability to process emotional information. The current study investigated the ability of children with disruptive behaviour disorders to label emotional faces and stories. Methods Participants (aged 7–12) were involved in a summer day treatment and research programme for children with disruptive behaviour problems. Two tasks were administered that were designed to measure participant's ability to recognize and label facial expressions of emotion, as well as their ability to label emotions in hypothetical situations. Results Results indicated that children with higher levels of CU traits, regardless of whether they had elevated CP scores, were less accurate in identifying sad facial expressions. Interestingly, children with higher CU scores were more accurate in labelling fear than were children with lower CU scores, while children with high CP but low CU traits were less accurate than other children in interpreting fearful facial emotions. Further, children's recognition of various emotional vignettes was not associated with CP, CU traits or their interaction. Conclusions The current study demonstrated that it was the combination of CP and a high number of CU traits that differentiated emotional attributions. Consistent with previous research, youth with CU traits had more difficulty in identifying sad facial expressions. However, contrasting with some previous studies, higher CU traits were associated with more accurate perceptions of fearful expressions. It is possible that there is something specific to fear recognition for individuals with more psychopathic, CU traits that actually make them more successful for observing or recognizing fearful expressions. Additional research is needed to clarify both the recognition and processing of fear expression in CP children with and without CU.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These conduct problems differ from the predominantly reactive problems frequently associated with ODD, and often reflect forethought and intentional manipulation of others in the achievement of relationship goals.
“As noted above, these conduct problems differ from the predominantly reactive problems frequently associated with ODD, and often reflect forethought and intentional manipulation of others in the achievement of relationship goals (e.g., White et al., 2013; Wolke et al., 2000; Woodworth & Waschbusch, 2007).”
From Perceived Parent–Child Relations, Conduct Problems, and Clinical Improvement Following the Treatment of Oppositional Defiant Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Woodworth & Waschbusch, 2007
Cites
Reduced sensitivity to others' fearful expressions in psychopathic individuals
Blair, R. J. R., Mitchell, D. G. V., Peschardt, K. S., Colledge, E., Leonard, R. A., Shine, J. H., Murray, L. K., & Perrett, D. I. (2004) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.008 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and children's emotion dysregulation: A meta-analysis.
Graziano, P. A., & Garcia, A. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.011 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Roles of callous-unemotional traits, narcissism, and Machiavellianism in childhood aggression
Kerig, P. K., & Stellwagen, K. K. (2010) · Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10862-009-9168-7 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Wallace, G. L., Case, L. K., Harms, M. B., Silvers, J. A., Kenworthy, L., & Martin, A. (2011) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1170-0 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Vieira, J. B., Tavares, T. P., Marsh, A. A., & Mitchell, D. G. V. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23467 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Booker, J. A., Ollendick, T. H., Dunsmore, J. C., & Greene, R. W. (2016) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0323-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Woodworth, M., & Waschbusch, D.
- Venue
- Child: Care, Health and Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11-20
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 234-244
- ISSN
- 0305-1862
- 1365-2214
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review