Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy and safety of a recombinant anti‐immunoglobulin E antibody (omalizumab) in severe allergic asthma

Holgate, S. T., Chuchalin, A. G., Hébert, J., Lötvall, J., Persson, G. B., Chung, K. F., Bousquet, J., Kerstjens, H. A., Fox, H., Thirlwell, J., Cioppa, G. Della, on behalf of the Omalizumab 011 International Study Group·2004·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Background Patients with severe asthma are often inadequately controlled on existing anti‐asthma therapy, constituting an unmet clinical need. Objective This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial evaluated the ability of omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti‐IgE antibody, to improve disease control sufficiently to enable inhaled corticosteroid reduction in patients with severe allergic asthma. Methods After a run‐in period when an optimized fluticasone dose (1000 μg/day) was received for 4 weeks, patients were randomized to receive subcutaneous omalizumab [minimum 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/mL) per 4 weeks; n=126] or matching placebo (n=120) at intervals of 2 or 4 weeks. The study comprised a 16‐week add‐on phase of treatment followed by a 16‐week fluticasone‐reduction phase. Short‐/long‐acting β 2‐agonists were allowed as needed. Results Median reductions in fluticasone dose were significantly greater with omalizumab than placebo: 60% vs. 50% (P=0.003). Some 73.8% and 50.8% of patients, respectively, achieved a 50% dose reduction (P=0.001). Fluticasone dose reduction to 500 μg/day occurred in 60.3% of omalizumab recipients vs. 45.8% of placebo‐treated patients (P=0.026). Through both phases, omalizumab reduced rescue medication requirements, improved asthma symptoms and asthma‐related quality of life compared to placebo. Conclusion Omalizumab treatment improves asthma control in severely allergic asthmatics, reducing inhaled corticosteroid requirements without worsening of symptom control or increase in rescue medication use.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1916.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
Holgate, S. T., Chuchalin, A. G., Hébert, J., Lötvall, J., Persson, G. B., Chung, K. F., Bousquet, J., Kerstjens, H. A., Fox, H., Thirlwell, J., Cioppa, G. D., & on behalf of the Omalizumab 011 International Study Group
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
632-638
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2097981132
Cited by
522
References
3
FWCI
20.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and safety of a recombinant anti‐immunoglobulin E antibody (omalizumab) in severe allergic asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1916.x
The paper
Holgate, S. T., Chuchalin, A. G., Hébert, J., Lötvall, J., Persson, G. B., Chung, K. F., Bousquet, J., Kerstjens, H. A., Fox, H., Thirlwell, J., Cioppa, G. D., & on behalf of the Omalizumab 011 International Study Group. (2004). Efficacy and safety of a recombinant anti‐immunoglobulin E antibody (omalizumab) in severe allergic asthma. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.1916.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.