Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,123

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Benefits of omalizumab as add‐on therapy in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite best available therapy (GINA 2002 step 4 treatment): INNOVATE

Open access
Humbert, M., Beasley, R., Ayres, J., Slavin, R., Hébert, J., Bousquet, J., Beeh, K.‐M., Ramos, S., Canonica, G. W., Hedgecock, S., Fox, H., Blogg, M., Surrey, K.·2005·Allergy

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2002 step 4 therapy are a challenging population with significant unmet medical need. We determined the effect of omalizumab on clinically significant asthma exacerbations (requiring systemic corticosteroids) in the first omalizumab study to exclusively enrol patients from this difficult‐to‐treat patient population. Methods: Following a run‐in phase, patients (12–75 years) inadequately controlled despite therapy with high‐dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long‐acting β2‐agonists (LABA) with reduced lung function and a recent history of clinically significant exacerbations were randomized to receive omalizumab or placebo for 28 weeks in a double‐blind, parallel‐group, multicentre study. Results: A total of 419 patients were included in the efficacy analyses. The clinically significant asthma exacerbation rate (primary efficacy variable), adjusted for an observed relevant imbalance in history of clinically significant asthma exacerbations, was 0.68 with omalizumab and 0.91 with placebo (26% reduction) during the 28‐week treatment phase (P = 0.042). Without adjustment, a similar magnitude of effect was seen (19% reduction), but this did not reach statistical significance. Omalizumab significantly reduced severe asthma exacerbation rate (0.24 vs 0.48, P = 0.002) and emergency visit rate (0.24 vs 0.43, P = 0.038). Omalizumab significantly improved asthma‐related quality of life, morning peak expiratory flow and asthma symptom scores. The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. Conclusions: In patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent asthma, despite high‐dose ICS and LABA therapy, and often additional therapy, omalizumab significantly reduced the rate of clinically significant asthma exacerbations, severe exacerbations and emergency visits. Omalizumab is effective and should be considered as add‐on therapy for patients with inadequately controlled severe persistent asthma who have a significant unmet need despite best available therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00772.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 1,123

Metadata

Authors
Humbert, M., Beasley, R., Ayres, J., Slavin, R., Hébert, J., Bousquet, J., Beeh, K. ‐., Ramos, S., Canonica, G. W., Hedgecock, S., Fox, H., Blogg, M., & Surrey, K.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12-20
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
309-316
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2029587541
Cited by
1,123
References
31
FWCI
24.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits of omalizumab as add‐on therapy in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite best available therapy (GINA 2002 step 4 treatment): INNOVATE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00772.x
The paper
Humbert, M., Beasley, R., Ayres, J., Slavin, R., Hébert, J., Bousquet, J., Beeh, K. ‐., Ramos, S., Canonica, G. W., Hedgecock, S., Fox, H., Blogg, M., & Surrey, K. (2005). Benefits of omalizumab as add‐on therapy in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled despite best available therapy (GINA 2002 step 4 treatment): INNOVATE. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00772.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.