The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acne scarring treatment using skin needling
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acne is a common condition seen in up to 80% of people between 11 and 30 years of age and in up to 5% of older adults. In some patients, it can result in permanent scars that are surprisingly difficult to treat. A relatively new treatment, termed skin needling (needle dermabrasion), seems to be appropriate for the treatment of rolling scars in acne. AIM: To confirm the usefulness of skin needling in acne scarring treatment. METHODS: The present study was conducted from September 2007 to March 2008 at the Department of Systemic Pathology, University of Naples Federico II and the UOC Dermatology Unit, University of Rome La Sapienza. In total, 32 patients (20 female, 12 male patients; age range 17-45) with acne rolling scars were enrolled. Each patient was treated with a specific tool in two sessions. Using digital cameras, photos of all patients were taken to evaluate scar depth and, in five patients, silicone rubber was used to make a microrelief impression of the scars. The photographic data were analysed by using the sign test statistic (alpha < 0.05) and the data from the cutaneous casts were analysed by fast Fourier transformation (FFT). RESULTS: Analysis of the patient photographs, supported by the sign test and of the degree of irregularity of the surface microrelief, supported by FFT, showed that, after only two sessions, the severity grade of rolling scars in all patients was greatly reduced and there was an overall aesthetic improvement. No patient showed any visible signs of the procedure or hyperpigmentation. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms that skin needling has an immediate effect in improving acne rolling scars and has advantages over other procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery
Kim, Y.-C., Park, J.-H., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005 · Cited by 1,760
Larrañeta, E., Lutton, R. E. M., Woolfson, A. D., & Donnelly, R. F. (2016) · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.mser.2016.03.001 · Cited by 964
Microneedling: Advances and widening horizons
Yadav, S., & Singh, A. (2016) · Indian Dermatology Online Journal · doi:10.4103/2229-5178.185468 · Cited by 321
Microneedling: A Review and Practical Guide
Alster, T. S., & Graham, P. M. (2018) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1097/dss.0000000000001248 · Cited by 235
Postinflammatory Hyperpigmentation: Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Pathogenesis and Treatment
Kaufman, B. P., Aman, T., & Alexis, A. F. (2018) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-017-0333-6 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Fabbrocini, G., Fardella, N., Monfrecola, A., Proietti, I., & Innocenzi, D.
- Venue
- Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 874-879
- ISSN
- 0307-6938 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2230
- OpenAlex
- W2142250447
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acne scarring treatment using skin needling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03291.x
- The paper
- Fabbrocini, G., Fardella, N., Monfrecola, A., Proietti, I., & Innocenzi, D. (2009). Acne scarring treatment using skin needling. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2009.03291.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.